2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iEnhancer-EL: identifying enhancers and their strength with ensemble learning approach

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…iEnhancer-EL [70] and iEnhancer-2L [26] produced better outcomes using ensemble classifiers and achieved accuracy of 78.03% and 76.89% respectively in which they were successful in predicting strong enhancers with accuracy of 65.03% and 61.93% respectively. Whereas EnhancerPred [27] achieved 80.82% accuracy and used SVMs which produced slightly better results in predicting strong enhancers with 62.06% accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iEnhancer-EL [70] and iEnhancer-2L [26] produced better outcomes using ensemble classifiers and achieved accuracy of 78.03% and 76.89% respectively in which they were successful in predicting strong enhancers with accuracy of 65.03% and 61.93% respectively. Whereas EnhancerPred [27] achieved 80.82% accuracy and used SVMs which produced slightly better results in predicting strong enhancers with 62.06% accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A user-friendly web-server which is publically accessible, as indicated in [68] and also in a series of latest publications (see, e.g., [65,[69][70][71][72][73][74]), represents the steps ahead for developing prediction methods and computational tools which are more practical and useful. We therefore, in our future works, shall make efforts to provide a web-server for the prediction method presented in this paper.…”
Section: Comparison Of Evolstruct-phogly With the Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector machines (SVMs) and random forest classifiers remain common approaches (e.g. Arbel et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2018;He et al, 2017;Le et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2018), although 'deep learning' approaches using artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been increasing in popularity as these methods become more mature and more feasible with current advances in computing power (e.g. Chen et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2016;Min et al, 2017;Yang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Computational Enhancer Prediction Through Integration Of Mulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, approaches that rely solely on genome sequence are likely to be the most appealing to researchers that use non-traditional insect models. A number of these are available, most of which fall into the 'specific' enhancer discovery class Kazemian and Halfon, 2019;Le et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2018). In general, these approaches deconstruct the training sequences into a set of small (e.g.…”
Section: Enhancer Prediction Independent Of Experimentally Derived Fementioning
confidence: 99%