2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0030605300031847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question?

Abstract: Proponents of community conservation present it as a means of reconciling conservation and development objectives by ensuring that the interests of local people are taken into account in making trade-offs. Conservation critics see it as a challenge to the state-led, scientific management that is necessary to guarantee the preservation of biodiversity. In this paper, we argue that community conservation is not one thing but many. It is evolving both as a concept and as a practice that must be built on. It is no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
112
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of successful examples where communities and conservationists in Madagascar have worked together to develop local laws to manage access to important natural resources, resulting in improved management (Rakotoniaina & Randriamanampisoa, 1999;Durbin et al, 2003). However, the natural resource needs of communities may be supplied by a relatively narrow range of species, and thus people may have little incentive to conserve the full range of biodiversity (Adams & Hulme, 2001). However, the natural resource needs of communities may be supplied by a relatively narrow range of species, and thus people may have little incentive to conserve the full range of biodiversity (Adams & Hulme, 2001).…”
Section: Conclusion and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of successful examples where communities and conservationists in Madagascar have worked together to develop local laws to manage access to important natural resources, resulting in improved management (Rakotoniaina & Randriamanampisoa, 1999;Durbin et al, 2003). However, the natural resource needs of communities may be supplied by a relatively narrow range of species, and thus people may have little incentive to conserve the full range of biodiversity (Adams & Hulme, 2001). However, the natural resource needs of communities may be supplied by a relatively narrow range of species, and thus people may have little incentive to conserve the full range of biodiversity (Adams & Hulme, 2001).…”
Section: Conclusion and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Burkina Faso (2004) reported that its participatory NAP approach was unsustainable due to a lack of funding, while several other countries stated a lack of financial resources as one of the main barriers to NAP development, implementation and the enactment of participatory approaches (e.g., Republic of Algeria, 2004; Republic of Mali, 2004; Republic of Egypt, 2004; Republic of Cape Verde, 2004). This is a problem for participatory approaches in general, not just to desertification related ones (e.g., Cleaver, 1999; Adams and Hulme, 2001). However, it has a large impact on NGO and local community involvement in NAP and project development, as there are often insufficient resources to engage interested groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both trends met in a growing concern about the "degradation of nature" and led to the development of concepts like community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) that contain clear premises about the nature of resources and their sustainable uses (Adams and Hulme 2001;Agrawal 2003;Saunders 2010). Among those premises, "participation" became a salient vehicle to foster sustainability and to eradicate poverty (Cleaver 2001;Blaikie 2006;Reed 2008).…”
Section: Global Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%