2010
DOI: 10.1080/03003930903560547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution? An East European Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
52
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In planning practice, a territory can be delimited by a grouping of dominant functions, not only by administrative division, creating a functional region [10,72]. The negative effects of local self-government fragmentation into a large number of small municipalities may encourage local authorities to pool the management of local resources, co-operation being the only practical alternative to amalgamation as a solution for this problem, especially if the many types of functional areas that overlap each other are taken into account [73].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In planning practice, a territory can be delimited by a grouping of dominant functions, not only by administrative division, creating a functional region [10,72]. The negative effects of local self-government fragmentation into a large number of small municipalities may encourage local authorities to pool the management of local resources, co-operation being the only practical alternative to amalgamation as a solution for this problem, especially if the many types of functional areas that overlap each other are taken into account [73].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nordic countries (Nelson, 1992) and the United Kingdom (Goldsmith, 2002) engaged in aggressive policies towards municipal amalgamation, leading to eliminate more than three-fourths of their municipalities. Amalgamations also occurred in France and Switzerland (Soguel, 2001;Steiner, 2000), in East European countries, such as Bulgaria and Romania (Borecky and Prudky, 2001;Hajnal, 2001;Swianiewicz, 2006Swianiewicz, , 2010, in the United States and in Canada (Kushner and Siegel, 2005;Miranda and Lerner, 1995;Sancton, 1996).…”
Section: Reasons For Municipal Amalgamation: In Search Of Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Swianiewicz (2006Swianiewicz ( , 2010, countries with large municipalities are characterized by fewer income differences between municipalities, thus resulting in a lower level of social tensions compared to countries with small municipalities. In addition, Swianiewicz (2006Swianiewicz ( , 2010 argues that amalgamations tend to reduce the problem of free-riding, since large municipalities have lower incongruity between administrative boundaries and catchment areas of services.…”
Section: Reasons For Municipal Amalgamation: In Search Of Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 . As pointed out by Swianiewicz, (2010), amalgamations, of course, also have negative effects, such as distancing citizens from decision-making bodies, the overuse of some services, and decreases in service quality. 5 .…”
Section: The Levels Of Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%