2004
DOI: 10.1017/s1352465804001031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If the Evidence Is So Good – Why Doesn't Anyone Use Them? A National Survey of the Use of Computerized Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract: Computerized Self-help (CSH) has recently been the subject of a NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) review. This increase in interest is also reflected in the increase in advertising for CSH programmes. We report a national survey of a random sample of 500 therapists accredited with the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies, which is the lead organization for CBT in the UK. A total of 329 therapists responded (65.8%). A surprisingly small number of CBT therapists were u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
98
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the high attrition rates reported for computerised self-help suggest that such interventions might be more useful as an additional therapeutic tool rather than as a standalone intervention (Twomey et al, 2014). Finally, clinicians working in mainstream mental health services are more receptive towards using computers as an adjunct to face-to-face therapy rather than as a standalone intervention (Stallard, Richardson, & Velleman, 2010;Wangberg, Gammon, & Spitznogle, 2007;Whitfield & Williams, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the high attrition rates reported for computerised self-help suggest that such interventions might be more useful as an additional therapeutic tool rather than as a standalone intervention (Twomey et al, 2014). Finally, clinicians working in mainstream mental health services are more receptive towards using computers as an adjunct to face-to-face therapy rather than as a standalone intervention (Stallard, Richardson, & Velleman, 2010;Wangberg, Gammon, & Spitznogle, 2007;Whitfield & Williams, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps as a results of these limitations, some are of the view that CCBT is best delivered as a supplement (e.g. as a homework exercise to reinforce content covered in face-to-face therapy sessions), and not an alternative, to traditional therapist-guided treatment (MacLeod et al, 2009;Whitfield & Williams, 2004). However, this does not take into account the problems of delivering therapy to the high numbers of young people who never receive any treatment for their depression.…”
Section: Disadvantages and Advantages Of Ccbt For Sexual Minority Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic and mobile devices for mental health are available for various conditions, but implementation into clinical practice is low [74]. Also, there is no evidence that using novel media is promoting mental health, but new diagnostic entities have been introduced in the DSM-5, such as Internet addiction.…”
Section: Integrative Approaches To Improve Child and Adolescent Mentamentioning
confidence: 99%