2020
DOI: 10.1177/1524839919882385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If We Build It, Will They Come? Challenges of Adapting and Implementing a Smoking Cessation Program for the LGBTQ Community in Southcentral Texas

Abstract: Studies indicate that tobacco use among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) community members is consistently higher than the general population. The Last Drag is a tobacco cessation program developed and implemented in 1991 in San Francisco, California, that has shown promise in assisting LGBTQ members with tobacco cessation. This article describes the practical challenges of adapting The Last Drag to be implemented in a southcentral Texas community. Primary challenges included short time l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 45 The social context of health promotion is known to impact the target health behavior as well as how health interventions are received, play out, and make an impact. 94 For example, Williams et al 95 reflected on a failed attempt to implement a San Francisco-based SGM-tailored tobacco intervention in SGM communities in South Central Texas, reporting the need to address local social, cultural, and political factors when adapting and implementing existing interventions for different regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 45 The social context of health promotion is known to impact the target health behavior as well as how health interventions are received, play out, and make an impact. 94 For example, Williams et al 95 reflected on a failed attempt to implement a San Francisco-based SGM-tailored tobacco intervention in SGM communities in South Central Texas, reporting the need to address local social, cultural, and political factors when adapting and implementing existing interventions for different regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is well-established that SGM youth are at disproportionately high risk of CC usage [ 41 , 42 ]. Past research also suggests that the SGM population has been the major marketing target of the tobacco industry, resulting in increased difficulties for SGM youth to resist CC usage when such behavior is normalized by the public media [ 44 ]. With the increase in EC usage, recent research underlines that the same aggressive marketing strategy has also been employed by the EC industry and public media.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a disparity arises from a wide range of structural vulnerabilities such as unavoidable systemic discrimination and prejudice in education, employment, and health care opportunities [38,39]. Further, these structural vulnerabilities stem from the imbalanced hierarchical social power structure that is responsible for generating and widening the mental health gap between SGM and cis-heterosexual individuals while limiting SGM individuals' accessibility to determinants of health, leaving the SGM population defenseless against risky behaviors such as substance use [39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, factors such as limited ability to provide safe learning spaces, difficulties promoting student awareness and acceptance of diversity, and heteronormative policies and procedures have been found to be prohibitive of effective implementation among school-based programmes geared towards SOGD youth (Steck & Perry, 2018 ). Another potential barrier to implementing programming specific to SOGD communities is that individuals may be reluctant to participate in these efforts due to concerns of ‘coming out by proxy’ (Williams et al, 2020 ). Perceptions of interventionists’ lack of cultural competency or likelihood of stigmatizing those participating in prevention efforts may also limit participation from those within SOGD communities, particularly in regions where experiencing society stigma is heightened (Glasgow et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Recommendations For Enhancing Sogd Sexual Violence Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%