2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0022971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If you want to know, consider asking: How likely is it that patients will hurt themselves in the future?

Abstract: Although self-harming behavior is a common and costly problem for psychiatric inpatients released from the hospital, standardized tools that assess patients' risk for self-harm are rarely used in clinical settings. In this study of dually diagnosed psychiatric inpatients (N = 147), we assessed the utility of patients' self-perceptions of risk in predicting self-harm in the community. Patients' self-perceptions of risk predicted self-harm 8 weeks after discharge from the hospital (Lag 1; area under the curve [A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] We did not inquire from subjects on strategies that would have been beneficial in aborting the suicide attempt, this would have given better information from the patient perspective. [21] Our sample was limited to suicide attempters, and the results may not necessarily extrapolate to suicide completers. The findings of the study relate to a tertiary care center in India, and generalization to other settings should be done with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] We did not inquire from subjects on strategies that would have been beneficial in aborting the suicide attempt, this would have given better information from the patient perspective. [21] Our sample was limited to suicide attempters, and the results may not necessarily extrapolate to suicide completers. The findings of the study relate to a tertiary care center in India, and generalization to other settings should be done with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "direct cause" model that underpins this reentry approach rests on little empirical support (see Peterson et al, 2011). Although individuals with serious mental illness clearly need psychiatric services, managing offenders' mental health problems may do little to reduce their risk of recidivism.…”
Section: Challenges To the Current Policy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] - [28] We expand on existing research in several ways. Specifically, while some studies inquired about perception of self-harm risk without differentiating between suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury, [25] others collapsed the outcome of suicidal thoughts and behavior [26] or the suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury outcome, [23] thus limiting the interpretation of findings. In addition, we address methodological limitations of previous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we address methodological limitations of previous studies. Specifically, while some studies inquired about perception of self-harm risk without differentiating between suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury, [25] others collapsed the outcome of suicidal thoughts and behavior [26] or the suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury outcome, [23] thus limiting the interpretation of findings. Finally, no studies have examined how self-rated expectations of self-harm risk perform in combination with clinician-administered assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%