2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IFMIF High Flux Test Module—Recent progress in design and manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the relationship between total strain range and fatigue life for the HG-1.25 specimen in this study as well as in previous studies [11][12][13] in comparison with the Manson-Coffin-type regression curve defined by Eq. (2). The shorter fatigue life at the total strain range below 0.6% and the slightly longer fatigue life at the total strain range above 0.8% of the HG-1.25 specimen relative to those of standard specimens were clearly observed from a level of 10 2 to 10 4 cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Figure 5 shows the relationship between total strain range and fatigue life for the HG-1.25 specimen in this study as well as in previous studies [11][12][13] in comparison with the Manson-Coffin-type regression curve defined by Eq. (2). The shorter fatigue life at the total strain range below 0.6% and the slightly longer fatigue life at the total strain range above 0.8% of the HG-1.25 specimen relative to those of standard specimens were clearly observed from a level of 10 2 to 10 4 cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…17) Due to the specimen shape and size effect, it is possible that there are some differences in the crack growth behavior between the hourglass-type miniature fatigue specimen and standard specimen, for example, differences in the constants A-H in this work. Therefore, comparison of the crack growth behavior between these specimens and validation of utilizing the miniature specimen should be performed in a future work in order to utilize the fatigue life assessment based on the crack growth behavior in the actual fusion component.…”
Section: Necessity Of the Validation Of Utilizing Miniature Specimensmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, the crack growth behavior was evaluated using the hourglass-type miniature fatigue specimen because the evaluation of irradiation effect would be performed using miniature specimens irradiated in test reactors and the International Fusion Material Irradiation Facility (IFMIF). 17) Due to the specimen shape and size effect, it is possible that there are some differences in the crack growth behavior between the hourglass-type miniature fatigue specimen and standard specimen, for example, differences in the constants A-H in this work. Therefore, comparison of the crack growth behavior between these specimens and validation of utilizing the miniature specimen should be performed in a future work in order to utilize the fatigue life assessment based on the crack growth behavior in the actual fusion component.…”
Section: Necessity Of the Validation Of Utilizing Miniature Specimensmentioning
confidence: 96%