2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IFN-γ selectively suppresses a subset of TLR4-activated genes and enhancers to potentiate macrophage activation

Abstract: Activation of macrophage proinflammatory and antimicrobial phenotypes is regulated by IFN-γ and LPS via synergistic induction of canonical, inflammatory NF-κB target genes. However, whether IFN-γ negatively regulates components of the LPS response, and how this may affect macrophage activation, is still unclear. Here we use combined transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches to find that IFN-γ selectively abrogates LPS-induced feedback and alters macrophage metabolic pathways by suppressing TLR4-mediated gene ac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have revealed that STAT1 signaling is primarily activated by IFN‐γ in macrophages 33, 34 . Interestingly, some groups have reported that IFN‐γ even negatively regulated components of the LPS response 33, 35 . These support our results that disruption of Grx1 promoted the activity of STAT1 in IFN‐γ stimulated macrophages and consequently upregulated the transcription of downstream target genes such as CXCL9.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have revealed that STAT1 signaling is primarily activated by IFN‐γ in macrophages 33, 34 . Interestingly, some groups have reported that IFN‐γ even negatively regulated components of the LPS response 33, 35 . These support our results that disruption of Grx1 promoted the activity of STAT1 in IFN‐γ stimulated macrophages and consequently upregulated the transcription of downstream target genes such as CXCL9.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…33,34 Interestingly, some groups have reported that IFN-γ even negatively regulated components of the LPS response. 33,35 These support our results that disruption of Grx1 promoted the activity of STAT1 in IFN-γ stimulated macrophages and consequently upregulated the transcription of downstream target genes such as CXCL9. However, the expressions of other M1-related molecules during the process of IFN-γ stimulation need to be investigated in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As an alternative approach, we utilized human OCPs adenovirally-transduced to express FLAG-tagged MEF2C, where high affinity and specificity FLAG antibodies enable detection of strong and specific signals in ChIP-qPCR assays. We identified three potential MEF2C binding sites, termed R1–R3, in the upstream region of the c-FOS promoter based on the publicly available ENCODE MEF2C ChIP-seq database obtained using the GM12878 cell line, an established lymphoblastoid cell line 30 and we also confirmed that the potential MEF2C binding sites were regions of open chromatin (detected by ATAC-seq) and were bound by PU.1, a lineage-determining transcription factor in human OCPs 31 (Fig. 6a , Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Several TFs have been demonstrated to be involved in modulating the M2 phenotype of macrophages, such as PRDM1, MAF, STAT6, STAT3, HIF-1α, and C/EBPβ (10,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). We assumed that AZD5153 epigenetically regulated the macrophage phenotype via alternating the expression levels of pivotal TFs.…”
Section: Azd5153 Depolarized M2-like Macrophages By Inhibiting Mafmentioning
confidence: 99%