2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IFNβ Treatment Inhibits Nerve Injury-induced Mechanical Allodynia and MAPK Signaling By Activating ISG15 in Mouse Spinal Cord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that CNS-released type I IFNs have a different action on nociceptor central terminals than type I IFNs released in the periphery have on nociceptor peripheral ending and cell bodies. Another possibility is that very high doses of type I IFNs (5000-10,000 U) produce an inhibition of MAPK signaling, as recently shown in the dorsal horn in the context of neuropathic pain (Liu et al, 2019). .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is possible that CNS-released type I IFNs have a different action on nociceptor central terminals than type I IFNs released in the periphery have on nociceptor peripheral ending and cell bodies. Another possibility is that very high doses of type I IFNs (5000-10,000 U) produce an inhibition of MAPK signaling, as recently shown in the dorsal horn in the context of neuropathic pain (Liu et al, 2019). .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is possible that CNS-released type I IFNs have a different action on nociceptor central terminals than type 1 IFNs released in the periphery have on nociceptor peripheral ending and cell bodies. Another possibility is that very high doses of type I IFNs (5,000-10,000 units) produce an inhibition of MAPK signaling, as recently shown in the dorsal horn in the context of neuropathic pain (Liu et al, 2019). We show that lower doses of type I IFNs (300 units) produce clear MAPK signaling activation in DRG neurons in vitro and in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…IFNs are the best-known cytokines that are induced by virus infection to fight against infection, and a recent study shows that type-I IFN production is controlled by STING in the pain pathway and the STING/type-I IFN axis is present in the normal DRGs and controls physiological pain under the homeostasis condition. The role of type-I IFNs in pain is still controversial, as both pronociceptive actions (35,55) and antinociceptive actions (8,9,33,34,(36)(37)(38) of IFN-a and IFNb have been reported, depending on the locations and doses (Table 1). This discrepancy may also depend on conditions (physiological vs. pathological) and phases (acute vs. chronic).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks Clinical Relevance and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%