Objective: The translation of promising therapies from pre-clinical models of hindlimb ischemia (HLI) to patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been inadequate. While this failure is multifactorial, primary outcome measures in preclinical HLI models and clinical trials involving patients with PAD are not aligned well. For example, laser Doppler perfusion recovery measured under resting conditions is the most used outcome in HLI studies, whereas clinical trials involving patients with PAD primarily assess walking performance. Here, we develop a 6-min limb function test for preclinical models that assesses muscular performance and hemodynamics congruently. Approach and Results: We developed an in situ 6-min limb function test that involves repeated isotonic (shortening) contractions performed against a submaximal load. Continuous measurement of muscle blood flow was performed using laser Doppler flowmetry. Quantification of muscle power, work, and perfusion are obtained across the test. We performed HLI on several mouse strains: C57BL6J, BALBc/J, and MCK-PGC1a (muscle-specific overexpression of PGC1a). Additional experiments were performed using an exercise intervention (voluntary wheel running) following HLI. The 6-min limb function test was successful at detecting differences in limb function of C57BL6/J and BALBc/J mice subjected to HLI with effect sizes superior to laser Doppler. C57BL6/J mice randomized to exercise therapy following HLI had smaller decline in muscle power, greater hyperemia, and performed more work compared to non-exercise controls with HLI. Mice with muscle-specific overexpression of PGC1a had no differences in perfusion recovery in resting conditions, but exhibited greater capillary density, increased muscle mass and absolute force levels, and performed more work across the 6-min limb function test compared to their wildtype littermates. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the efficacy of the 6-min limb function test to detect differences in the response to HLI where traditional perfusion recovery, capillary density, and muscle strength measures were unable to detect therapeutic differences.