1995
DOI: 10.13182/fst95-a11947087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ignition Analysis on the High Field D-T Helical Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding operation path to POPCON in figure 9 is shown in figure 10. The operation path is moved to the lower temperature and high density side by density increase when the fusion power starts to increase at 30 s. This is due to the fact that the density limit is increased by the increase in dW/dt at t = 31.45 s, because it is proportional to √ P NET = √ P L + dW/dt, as seen in equation (3). The difference between P EXT and dW/dt is P H = 20.2 MW, which is slightly larger than the height of the contour map and is used to overpass the saddle point.…”
Section: Ignition Access and The Heating Power With The Time Constant...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The corresponding operation path to POPCON in figure 9 is shown in figure 10. The operation path is moved to the lower temperature and high density side by density increase when the fusion power starts to increase at 30 s. This is due to the fact that the density limit is increased by the increase in dW/dt at t = 31.45 s, because it is proportional to √ P NET = √ P L + dW/dt, as seen in equation (3). The difference between P EXT and dW/dt is P H = 20.2 MW, which is slightly larger than the height of the contour map and is used to overpass the saddle point.…”
Section: Ignition Access and The Heating Power With The Time Constant...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While system codes analysing the steady state plasma parameters have been used for stellarator reactors [1,2], we have been studying temporal evolutions of these parameters in helical reactors [3][4][5][6]. Recently, based on the Large Helical Device (LHD) ( ā = 0.6 m, B o = 3 T) experiments, we have determined the FFHR2m reactor size using the LHD size scaling including the blanket thickness and machine weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%