2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ignition delay times of live and dead pinus radiata needles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8), but not live twigs and stems, showing the expedited water escape from dead woody material and suggesting a considerably higher water retention by live compared to dead material. The results reported in the current work partially align with results reported in other studies, which highlighted longer ignition times but lower intensities in live fuel (Jervis and Rein 2016;Reszka et al 2020;Ramadhan et al 2021), though their results cannot be compared directly due to the live fuels having higher moisture content in these studies. Our findings are also consistent with results reported by Zhao et al (2014) where intact, undecomposed dead twigs dried out slower and took more time to ignite than partially decomposed dead twigs of the same moisture content.…”
Section: Effect Of Live and Dead Fuelsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8), but not live twigs and stems, showing the expedited water escape from dead woody material and suggesting a considerably higher water retention by live compared to dead material. The results reported in the current work partially align with results reported in other studies, which highlighted longer ignition times but lower intensities in live fuel (Jervis and Rein 2016;Reszka et al 2020;Ramadhan et al 2021), though their results cannot be compared directly due to the live fuels having higher moisture content in these studies. Our findings are also consistent with results reported by Zhao et al (2014) where intact, undecomposed dead twigs dried out slower and took more time to ignite than partially decomposed dead twigs of the same moisture content.…”
Section: Effect Of Live and Dead Fuelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, water transport throughout xylem structure during combustion in an intact living shrub may affect flammability of live tissue, further contributing to differences between live and dead fuel. Nevertheless, the ability to test live and dead fuels at equivalent moisture content in this study made it possible to evaluate the effect of condition without the confounding effect of moisture content, addressing the challenges faced by previous research (Pickett et al 2010;Reszka et al 2020) in matching moisture contents of live and dead fuels. This approach underscores the contribution of our research to the understanding of fuel flammability beyond the lens of moisture content alone, as highlighted in other investigations (Jolly et al 2012;Ramadhan et al 2021).…”
Section: Effect Of Live and Dead Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intermittent and continuous ignition of pinus radiata needles (live, dead, a mixture of dried and re-moistened needles) is studied in [136]. The ignition delay times with the corresponding confidence intervals were obtained depending on the applied heat flux.…”
Section: Forest Fuel Ignitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies devoted to the investigation of the biomass ignition and combustion processes are also of great importance. The obtained data make it possible to determine the typical temperatures and ignition delay times of the samples and to estimate the regularities of this process [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. It was noted that the ignition of living and dead fuels occurs in different ways due to the moisture content in the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%