Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: The Fundamental of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program, endorsed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, has been instrumental in enhancing and assessing laparoscopic skills among trainees. However, whether a simulator-based training leads to trainees' awareness of their limitations remains unexplored. Participants and Methods: Twenty-one participants (10 novices and 11 experienced) were included, and categorized based on their participation in a laparoscopic training program held at the Saint Joseph University of Beirut. Trainees' development of basic and complex laparoscopic skills was assessed using standardized FLS tasks. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to evaluate participants' satisfaction, confidence, and self-assessment levels during task execution. Results: Both groups completed the basic psychomotor tasks successfully, but the experienced group was significantly faster (p<0.005). Experienced participants were able to complete the intracorporeal knot versus half of novices (p=0.023), with the experienced group being better performing and faster. Most of experienced and none of novices manage to accomplish the end-to-end anastomosis. Both groups exhibited comparable levels of confidence, satisfaction, frustration, and difficulty perception. No significant distinction is found between the two groups in terms of performance self-rating. Also, no significant correlation is found between the levels of self-assessment and the objective scores of precision cutting and anastomosis among participants. Conclusion: This study reaffirms the effectiveness of simulation-based laparoscopic training for developing and retaining basic and complex surgical skills. While such training enhances stress management and self-confidence, it still insufficient to develop high level of vigilance and self-awareness.
Background: The Fundamental of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program, endorsed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, has been instrumental in enhancing and assessing laparoscopic skills among trainees. However, whether a simulator-based training leads to trainees' awareness of their limitations remains unexplored. Participants and Methods: Twenty-one participants (10 novices and 11 experienced) were included, and categorized based on their participation in a laparoscopic training program held at the Saint Joseph University of Beirut. Trainees' development of basic and complex laparoscopic skills was assessed using standardized FLS tasks. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to evaluate participants' satisfaction, confidence, and self-assessment levels during task execution. Results: Both groups completed the basic psychomotor tasks successfully, but the experienced group was significantly faster (p<0.005). Experienced participants were able to complete the intracorporeal knot versus half of novices (p=0.023), with the experienced group being better performing and faster. Most of experienced and none of novices manage to accomplish the end-to-end anastomosis. Both groups exhibited comparable levels of confidence, satisfaction, frustration, and difficulty perception. No significant distinction is found between the two groups in terms of performance self-rating. Also, no significant correlation is found between the levels of self-assessment and the objective scores of precision cutting and anastomosis among participants. Conclusion: This study reaffirms the effectiveness of simulation-based laparoscopic training for developing and retaining basic and complex surgical skills. While such training enhances stress management and self-confidence, it still insufficient to develop high level of vigilance and self-awareness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.