2000
DOI: 10.1162/089892900561968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

II. Hypersociability in Williams Syndrome

Abstract: Studies of abnormal populations provide a rare opportunity for examining relationships between cognition, genotype and brain neurobiology, permitting comparisons across these different levels of analysis. In our studies, we investigate individuals with a rare, genetically based disorder called Williams syndrome (WMS) to draw links among these levels. A critical component of such a cross-domain undertaking is the clear delineation of the phenotype of the disorder in question. Of special interest in this paper i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
420
3
14

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 455 publications
(460 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
23
420
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, participants rated the positive stimuli similarly to participants with WS in the studies by Jones et al (2000) and Martens et al (2009). However the ratings for the negative stimuli were rated more favourably which indicates that participants in this study were more willing to approach the negative faces than the participants in studies by Jones et al (2000) and Martens et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, participants rated the positive stimuli similarly to participants with WS in the studies by Jones et al (2000) and Martens et al (2009). However the ratings for the negative stimuli were rated more favourably which indicates that participants in this study were more willing to approach the negative faces than the participants in studies by Jones et al (2000) and Martens et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Hypersociability is frequently cited to be a defining feature of the social phenotype associated with WS (Järvinen-Pasley, Adolphs, Yam, Hill, Grichanik, Reilly & Bellugi, 2010) and has been described as a 'general presentation of extreme happiness' (Levine & Wharton, 2000; p.364); being 'unusually sociable, friendly and empathic' (Jones, Bellugi, Lai, Chiles, Reilly, Lincoln & Adolphs, 2000 p. 30), an excessive interest in others and a distinct lack of inhibition with regard to approaching others in social contexts (Bellugi, Järvinen-Pasley, Doyle Reilly, Reiss & Korenberg, 2007;Jones et al, 2000). Individuals with WS appear RUNNING HEAD: Social Approach in Williams syndrome 4 hypersociable from an early age (Doyle, Bellugi, Korenberg & Graham, 2004), demonstrating an eagerness to make eye contact with and to approach strangers (Mervis & Klein-Tasman, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological and behavioural markers include mild-moderate intellectual disability (ID; Udwin, Yule, & Martin, 1987), a sociable disposition (e.g. Jones et al, 2000), heightened anxiety (Dykens, 2003) and hyper-sensitivity to sound (e.g. Gallo, Klein-Tasman, Gaffrey, & Curran, 2008).…”
Section: Aetiological and Cognitive Characteristics Of Williams And Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that RAD has been reported only in children with histories of either maltreatment or institutional rearing, but this may be because the pathogenic care criterion is required. Furthermore, the pathogenic care criterion is particularly important in distinguishing indiscriminate/disinhibited RAD from conditions such as Williams syndrome and fetal alcohol syndrome, both of which have been reported to be associated with indiscriminate social behavior (Jacobson & Jacobson, 2003;Jones et al, 2000).…”
Section: Quality Of Caregiving and Radmentioning
confidence: 99%