2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cuor.2004.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(ii) The classification of shoulder instability: new light through old windows!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is likely explained by the fact that the transition between traumatic and atraumatic shoulder instability comprises a large gray area and a clear distinction between the groups is not always possible. 8 In general, the deficiency of glenoid concavity appears to be more pronounced in patients with atraumatic instability than patients with traumatic instability. 8 The introduction of the BSSR allows for quantification of the passive bony stabilizers of the shoulder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is likely explained by the fact that the transition between traumatic and atraumatic shoulder instability comprises a large gray area and a clear distinction between the groups is not always possible. 8 In general, the deficiency of glenoid concavity appears to be more pronounced in patients with atraumatic instability than patients with traumatic instability. 8 The introduction of the BSSR allows for quantification of the passive bony stabilizers of the shoulder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In general, the deficiency of glenoid concavity appears to be more pronounced in patients with atraumatic instability than patients with traumatic instability. 8 The introduction of the BSSR allows for quantification of the passive bony stabilizers of the shoulder. The BSSR is a theoretical percentage predicting the stability of a glenohumeral joint based on CT measurements of its bony configuration by determining the maximum translational force against which a shoulder can be stabilized by a given concavity-compression force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The classification of instability is complex and multifaceted, and placing patients in particular groups is not always clear cut. 23,38 In this study, dislocation was defined as an instability event, with dislocation confirmed by radiographs. Best practice advocates surgical intervention following recurrent, traumatic, unidirectional dislocations, particularly in younger patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient presentations are grouped into 3 polar classes: Type I (true TUBS), Type II (true AMBRI), or Type III (muscle patterning or habitual non-structural disorders). In recognition of the continuity between groups, a triangular model was proposed in which a degree of polarity may be tailored to each presentation 53 (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Classification Of Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanmore triangle (developed by Bayley et al, 1986e2004; adapted from Lewis et al53 ). The triangular polarities represent extreme types of instability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%