Norbert Elias and Steven Pinker maintain that human´s history manifests a pacification trend regarding both international and international relations. They describe a steady decline of violence and cruelty within families, villages, gender relations and child care on the one side and regarding sovereignties such as states and nations on the other side. Although institutional improvements are regarded as decisive to this pacification trend both authors earmark psychological transformations as even more crucial. Both authors describe that premodern humans are shaped by psychological structures that resemble to those of children, thus referring to the old tradition of comparing ontogeny and historical developments, widely spread in the pre-war era of social sciences. The article here describes that modern Piagetian cross-cultural psychology supports this view evidencing that premodern peoples do not develop the fourth stage of human development, the formal operations, to that depth and extent as modern humans do, due to the expansion of education and socialisation techniques in the past generations. This new theory, called structure-genetic theory programme, is able to explain the facts Elias and Pinker demonstrate in a surprising and convincing way. The conclusions that have to be drawn from these insights go far beyond the research of the history of violence and touch the foundations of man´s history on earth. Elias (1976Elias ( /1994 combines sociogenetic developments and psychogenetic developments that relate to each other and create together the overall trend of social evolution and social change. Sociogenesis means the evolution of social relations, institutions, and states. Psychogenesis earmarks the evolution of the humans´ psyche, going from childlike to adult stages, from primitive to civilized forms, in the course of history. The evolution from undifferentiated and simple structures to differentiated and complex structures concerns both the sociogenetic and psychogenetic evolutions. Primitive, stateless societies, mainly basing on subsistence economy, match to primitive, childish personalities, whereas modern nations, basing on public institutions, complex social relations, and other features, require for their functioning more civilized, more mature, and psychologically more developed personalities (and therefore peoples).
Elias´ theory of civilizationElias´ theory does not base on racial theories and on evolutionary biology but on the connection of his own developmental assumptions, so to speak a selfmade developmental psychology, and a selfmade socialisation theory. Primitive social institutions and environments allow or make it possible that the human´s psyche has not to develop beyond lower, childish stages, whereas modern, complex social networks, relations, institutions, and states foster or force the people to climb on higher stages and to become more civilized and self-controlled. I would like to say already here that modern approaches are able to confirm this idea and to deepen and differentiate...