2019
DOI: 10.3390/v11050409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IIV-6 Inhibits NF-κB Responses in Drosophila

Abstract: The host immune response and virus-encoded immune evasion proteins pose constant, mutual selective pressure on each other. Virally encoded immune evasion proteins also indicate which host pathways must be inhibited to allow for viral replication. Here, we show that IIV-6 is capable of inhibiting the two Drosophila NF-κB signaling pathways, Imd and Toll. Antimicrobial peptide (AMP) gene induction downstream of either pathway is suppressed when cells infected with IIV-6 are also stimulated with Toll or Imd ligan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, however, we find several AMP and IM genes that normally are upregulated in NF-kB-dependent way upon bacterial and fungal infections including the fly microbiota ( Broderick et al 2014 ; Kounatidis et al 2017 ), to be downregulated following FHV infection at both 24- and 48 h p.i., even in aged flies. The role of NF-kB pathways in Drosophila antiviral immunity is complex and still not fully elucidated; however, the pattern of expression that we see here in comparison to Tris-injected controls aligns with previous findings, where infection of S2* cells with the DNA virus IIV-6 leads to downregulation of AMP genes, despite intact cleavage and nuclear translocation of Relish ( West et al 2019 ). In the same study the authors report that although the expression of several AMP genes increases at 12-h post-IIV-6 infection in vivo , in comparison to PBS-injected controls, it returns to baseline or below baseline at 24- and 48 h p.i.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, however, we find several AMP and IM genes that normally are upregulated in NF-kB-dependent way upon bacterial and fungal infections including the fly microbiota ( Broderick et al 2014 ; Kounatidis et al 2017 ), to be downregulated following FHV infection at both 24- and 48 h p.i., even in aged flies. The role of NF-kB pathways in Drosophila antiviral immunity is complex and still not fully elucidated; however, the pattern of expression that we see here in comparison to Tris-injected controls aligns with previous findings, where infection of S2* cells with the DNA virus IIV-6 leads to downregulation of AMP genes, despite intact cleavage and nuclear translocation of Relish ( West et al 2019 ). In the same study the authors report that although the expression of several AMP genes increases at 12-h post-IIV-6 infection in vivo , in comparison to PBS-injected controls, it returns to baseline or below baseline at 24- and 48 h p.i.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the same study the authors report that although the expression of several AMP genes increases at 12-h post-IIV-6 infection in vivo , in comparison to PBS-injected controls, it returns to baseline or below baseline at 24- and 48 h p.i. Repression of AMP gene expression following IIV-6 infection appears downstream of Relish and likely occurs at the level of Relish binding to the AMP gene promoter or at the level of transcriptional activation ( West et al 2019 ). Whether in the case of FHV infection in aged flies the strong AMP and IM gene repression is mediated by similar mechanisms will remain a focus of future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is possible that PQ-mediated activation of Relish and AMP expression might be regulated through an alternative noncanonical pathway as observed in ATM mutants 30 . A recent study demonstrated that Relish becomes activated in response to infection with the invertebrate iridescent virus 6 (IIV6) and that its translocation to the nucleus results in suppression of AMPs gene expression 75 . The failure of active Relish to induce downstream AMP gene expression upon PQ exposure suggests that transcriptional inhibition could occur at the promoter-binding site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IIV6 infection has also been shown to supress the induction of a large number of NF-κB-regulated genes associated with both the Toll and IMD pathways in S2* cells, with only a modest and transient induction of AMPs and a greater susceptibility to bacterial infection observed in flies in vivo [92]. This immune evasion appeared to be mediated by an immediate-early gene product [92].…”
Section: Viral Nf-κb Evasion In D Melanogastermentioning
confidence: 99%