Iliopsoas and Gluteal Muscles Are Asymmetric in Tennis Players but Not in Soccer Players

Abstract

PurposeTo determine the volume and degree of asymmetry of iliopsoas (IL) and gluteal muscles (GL) in tennis and soccer players.MethodsIL and GL volumes were determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in male professional tennis (TP) and soccer players (SP), and in non-active control subjects (CG) (n = 8, 15 and 6, respectively).ResultsThe dominant and non-dominant IL were hypertrophied in TP (24 and 36%, respectively, P<0.05) and SP (32 and 35%, respectively, P<0.05). In TP the asymmetric hypertrophy of IL (13% greater volume in the non-dominant than in the dominant IL, P<0.01) reversed the side-to-side relationship observed in CG (4% greater volume in the dominant than in the contralateral IL, P<0.01), whilst soccer players had similar volumes in both sides (P = 0.87). The degree of side-to-side asymmetry decreased linearly from the first lumbar disc to the pubic symphysis in TP (r = −0.97, P<0.001), SP (r = −0.85, P<0.01) and CG (r = −0.76, P<0.05). The slope of the relationship was lower in SP due to a greater hypertrophy of the proximal segments of the dominant IL. Soccer and CG had similar GL volumes in both sides (P = 0.11 and P = 0.19, for the dominant and contralateral GL, respectively). GL was asymmetrically hypertrophied in TP. The non-dominant GL volume was 20% greater in TP than in CG (P<0.05), whilst TP and CG had similar dominant GL volumes (P = 0.14).ConclusionsTennis elicits an asymmetric hypertrophy of IL and reverses the normal dominant-to-non-dominant balance observed in non-active controls, while soccer is associated to a symmetric hypertrophy of IL. Gluteal muscles are asymmetrically hypertrophied in TP, while SP display a similar size to that observed in controls. It remains to be determined whether the different patterns of IL and GL hypertrophy may influence the risk of injury.

The Effects of Repeated-Sprint Training on Field-Based Fitness Measures: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled and Non-Controlled Trials

“…Regardless of whether the sprints are cycling or running, the increasing emphasis on joint speed will place a greater emphasis on recruitment of the gluteus maximus muscle [48]. Furthermore, it seems likely that this muscle is underused in elite team-sports athletes, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealing the gluteal muscle group of elite soccer players to be no more hypertrophied than an age-matched, non-active control group [51]. Given that this muscle plays only a minor role in many other tasks, such as everyday walking, slow running or even slow cycling [48], it is suggested that there is considerable scope for neuromuscular adaptation.…”

Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injury in the tennis player

“…Over a 6-year period, Hutchinson et al reported an incidence of 0.8 per 1000 athletic exposures and a prevalence of 1.3 hip injuries per 100 elite junior tennis players 4. Sanchis-Moysi et al investigated the size of iliopsoas and gluteal muscles in professional tennis players as well as professional soccer players with the use of MRI 32. They found that tennis players demonstrated an asymmetric hypertrophy of the iliopsoas and reversed the normal dominant-to-non-dominant balance observed in non-active controls while gluteal muscles are asymmetrically hypertrophied.…”

“…Furthermore, when looking at the epidemiological literature for tennis injuries, there are surprisingly few studies on professional tennis players. Some of the investigations which have included professionals were included in this review,32 59 87 88 but most published studies have focused on either ‘high-level’ or ‘elite’ tennis players. In the future, additional studies on professional/Olympic level players would provide better insight and knowledge on the specific types of injuries these players sustain.…”

Marked Effects of Pilates on the Abdominal Muscles

“…It was estimated that to show a significant increase of at least 6% in RA muscle volume, a sample size of at least 10 women would be required (a = 0.05, power = 0.80) (26,38,39). Twelve healthy premenopausal women agreed to participate in the study.…”