2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iliotibial band irritation caused by the EndoButton after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Report of two cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local sensitivity is such that even small endobutton plates (Smith and Nephew, Andover, MA, USA) used for ACL reconstruction may cause pain in the region, as reported by Taketomi et al [26]. Helito et al, in a case series with PLC femoral fixation using screws with toothed washers, encountered lateral pain in 50 % of patients [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Local sensitivity is such that even small endobutton plates (Smith and Nephew, Andover, MA, USA) used for ACL reconstruction may cause pain in the region, as reported by Taketomi et al [26]. Helito et al, in a case series with PLC femoral fixation using screws with toothed washers, encountered lateral pain in 50 % of patients [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both advantages and complications have been described with aperture and suspensory fixation methods. Interference screws are subject to failure, fracture, and intra-articular migration 11 - 14 , whereas suspensory buttons have been associated with iliotibial band and extensor tendon irritation, detachment, migration, and tunnel widening 15 - 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several case reports documenting the potential complications of utilizing cortical suspensory fixation for ACL surgery, in particular device malpositioning or soft tissue interposition between the device and the femoral cortex during fixation. [24][25][26][27] Simonian et al noted a case where the device was fixed 10 mm off of the lateral femoral cortex, with soft tissue interposition between the device and the cortex. 24 Muneta et al reported a case where the device was away from the lateral femoral cortex and was "flipped" within the popliteal space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%