2016
DOI: 10.7827/turkishstudies.9499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

İlkokul Türkçe Eğitimi İçin Alternatif Bir Ölçme Değerlendirme Tekniği: Kelime İ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study, it was concluded that the control group students' learning about the subject at the end of the application process within the current program was inadequate and that meaningful learning could not be fully realized due to the inability to associate the subject with direct knowledge. These results were consistent with the findings of similar studies (Bahar et al, 1999;Bahar & Özatlı, 2003;Deveci et al, 2014;Ercan et al, 2010;Işıklı et al, 2011;Taşdere & Kaya 2016), which state that the word association test, which is a data collection tool, concretely reveals students' mental structures towards key concepts, in that it reveals the conceptual networks in students' minds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study, it was concluded that the control group students' learning about the subject at the end of the application process within the current program was inadequate and that meaningful learning could not be fully realized due to the inability to associate the subject with direct knowledge. These results were consistent with the findings of similar studies (Bahar et al, 1999;Bahar & Özatlı, 2003;Deveci et al, 2014;Ercan et al, 2010;Işıklı et al, 2011;Taşdere & Kaya 2016), which state that the word association test, which is a data collection tool, concretely reveals students' mental structures towards key concepts, in that it reveals the conceptual networks in students' minds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Araştırmada kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin mevcut program dâhilinde geçirdikleri uygulama süreci sonunda konuya ilişkin öğrenmelerinin yetersiz düzeyde kaldığı, konunun doğrudan bilgiler ile ilişkilendirilememesi nedeniyle anlamlı öğrenmenin tam anlamıyla gerçekleşemediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar bir veri toplama aracı olan kelime ilişkilendirme testinin öğrencilerin anahtar kavramlara dönük zihinsel yapılarını somut olarak ortaya koyduğunu belirten benzer araştırmaların (Bahar vd., 1999;Bahar & Özatlı, 2003;Deveci vd., 2014;Ercan vd., 2010;Işıklı vd., 2011;Taşdere & Kaya 2016) bulgularıyla öğrencilerin zihinlerindeki kavramsal ağları ortaya koyması bakımından uyumlu bulunmuştur.…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçunclassified
“…Bu bağlamda bireylerin zihinsel yapılarının ortaya konulması, kavram yanılgılarının tespit edilmesi, kavramsal değişim süreçlerinin belirlenmesi ve önbilgi düzeyinin tespit edilmesi amacıyla KİT kullanılabilmektedir (Işıklı, Taşdere ve Göz, 2011;Tokcan ve Yiter, 2017). Kaya ve Taşdere (2016) KİT'in yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımına uygun olduğunu söylemektedir. Tokcan 2015…”
Section: Results and Suggestionsunclassified
“…When the studies involving the use of WAT are examined, it could be stated that these studies were mostly carried out in the fields of science education. There is little research conducted in other fields (Kaya & Taşdere, 2016;Bahar, Johnstone & Sutcliffe, 1999;Bahar & Özatlı, 2003;Nakiboğlu, 2008;Ercan, Taşdere & Ercan, 2010;Bahar & Kılınç, 2001;Işıklı, Taşdere & Göz, 2011;Şimşek, 2013;Kurt & Ekici, 2013a;Kurt & Ekici, 2013b;Ekici & Kurt, 2014;Deveci, Çengelci & Gürdoğan Bayır, 2014;Balbağ, 2018a;Balbağ 2018b;Gündoğan & Gültekin, 2018). In this respect, the present study is considered to be important as it proves WAT to be a measurement and assessment tool that can be applicable for various purposes in different fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%