2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illegal logging as a disincentive to the establishment of a sustainable forest sector in the Amazon

Abstract: Brazil recently began granting timber concessions in public forests to promote sustainable forest use. The effectiveness of this strategy hinges on the design and implementation of the concessions themselves as well as their competitive position within the logging sector as a whole. There is, however, a lack of information on the competitive interaction between legal and illegal logging and its effects on concessions profits. We address this knowledge gap by using a spatially explicit simulation model of the A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained identified six commercial types of wood belonging to the family Fabaceae. According to Lewis et al (2005), this is the third largest family of vascular plants worldwide. Brazil has about 2,756 Fabaceae species cataloged, from which 1,507 are endemic (Zappi et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained identified six commercial types of wood belonging to the family Fabaceae. According to Lewis et al (2005), this is the third largest family of vascular plants worldwide. Brazil has about 2,756 Fabaceae species cataloged, from which 1,507 are endemic (Zappi et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas of tree loss in the protected Amazon are expected to be low as accessibility is difficult, whereas there is increasing risk along “agriculture‐forest frontiers” which is expected to have harmful long‐term effects (Figure ; Garrett et al, ), thus limiting the climate change mitigation benefits that the forest provides. Contrastingly, Santos de Lima et al () suggest that unprotected areas are expected to experience losses of up to 40% by 2050 due to illegal harvesting, noted previously to use enslaved workers (Bales, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Across much of the Amazon, legal logging (such as at Jamari) and illegal timber extraction have similar harvest intensities. Total simulated volume harvested during a 30‐year cycle under a legal scenario (RIL) is 1250 million m 3 , across 84.6 million ha (14.8 m 3 /ha), while illegal logging practices produce 1321 million m 3 across 91.1 million ha (14.5 m 3 /ha; Santos de Lima et al ., 2018). Thus, our findings are widely applicable to legal forestry, although less so to illegally logged forest where extraction will not follow RIL and thus residual damage to the forest is likely far higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%