Background
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment regimens are not adjusted in response to active disease as frequently as indicated. The objective of this study was to examine how disease activity and patients’ illness beliefs combine to predict future treatment changes in patients who are currently under the care of a rheumatologist.
Methods
We interviewed RA patients at baseline, 2, 4 and 6 months. We examined the association of disease activity (RAPID-4) and five specific illness beliefs (consequences, treatment control, symptom burden, concern, emotional impact) with future escalation of treatment using logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for age, current biologic use, and disease duration. Disease activity and illness beliefs were dichotomized at the median to create four dummy variables (e.g. Low disease activity + High illness belief) in order to examine the combined impact of disease activity and illness beliefs on escalation.
Results
Twenty-nine percent of the participants (N=142) had an escalation of treatment during the follow-up period. When examined separately, disease activity and four of the illness beliefs (consequences, symptom burden, concern, and emotional impact) were associated with future escalation. High disease activity was predictive of future escalation only when combined with high levels of consequences, concern, and emotional impact. The combinations of high disease activity and high consequences, concern, and emotional impact were much stronger predictors or future escalation than either factor in isolation.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that patients’ illness beliefs are an important determinant of treatment decisions which are not fully captured by disease activity measures alone.