Illness representations, coping, and illness outcomes in people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective Cancer is associated with negative health and emotional outcomes in those affected by it, suggesting the need to better understand the psychosocial determinants of illness outcomes and coping. The common sense model is the leading psychological model of selfregulation in the face of illness and assumes that subjective illness representations explain how people attempt to cope with illness. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the associations of the common sense model's illness representation dimensions with health and coping outcomes in people with cancer.Methods A systematic literature search located 54 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria, with 38 providing sufficient data for meta-analysis. A narrative review of the remaining studies was also conducted.Results Random-effects models revealed small to moderate effect sizes (Fisher Z) for the relations between illness representations and coping behaviors (in particular between control perceptions, problem-focused coping, and cognitive reappraisal) and moderate to large effect sizes between illness representations and illness outcomes (in particular between identity, consequences, emotional representations, and psychological distress). The narrative review of studies with insufficient data provided similar results. ConclusionsThe results indicate how illness representations relate to illness outcomes in people with cancer. However, more high-quality studies are needed to examine causal effects of illness representations on coping and outcomes. High heterogeneity indicates potential moderators of the relationships between illness representations and health and coping outcomes, including diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment-related variables. This review can inform the design of interventions to improve coping strategies and mental health outcomes in people with cancer. | Illness representations and the common sense modelThe common sense model of self-regulation of health and illness (CSM) 9 is a widely accepted psychological model of the processes underlying health and coping in people with chronic illness. According

The psychological impact of being on a monitoring pathway for localised prostate cancer: A UK‐wide mixed methods study

“…Our interview findings highlight several factors influencing adjustment. As previously shown for PCa and other cancer types, illness perceptions were important in adjustment, influencing positive reframing, and were often shaped by health professionals discussing the generally positive prognosis . A nurse‐led intervention to help men on WW cognitively reframe their diagnosis indicated that uncertainty can be reduced and quality of life improved, but further larger scale work is warranted.…”

Qualitatively Comparing the Support Needs of People with Cancer Based on Their History of Anxiety/Depression

“…Participants in Group 2 were generally younger than those in Group 4, had an average of one additional chronic illness per person (whereas only one participant in Group 4 had an additional chronic illness), reported they received more misinformation and misdiagnoses from health professionals, described less positive social support interactions, and perceived more, and more severe, cancer-related psychosocial consequences. This is in line with previous research that suggests that cancer patients who are younger [21–23], have additional chronic illnesses [24, 25], less social support [26, 27], and more negative illness representations [28], are more likely to experience higher levels of distress. This suggests that together with these potential risk factors, people who also have a history of long-term anxiety/depression and who have not developed coping strategies to manage these issues might be at risk to develop cancer-related anxiety/depression, and therefore may be more at need for support to prevent or decrease such anxiety/depression.…”

Illness perceptions of Chinese women with breast cancer and relationships with socio‐demographic and clinical characteristics

“…According to the criteria (a neutral point of 3) suggested by Cherrington et al () and unlike previous studies (McCorry et al, ; Shabahang et al, ), we explored other negative aspects of participants' perceptions of this illness: believing that the illness would result in serious consequences, perceiving themselves to have inadequate knowledge of breast cancer, and suffering emotional distress. Participants' perceptions of consequences were found to significantly correlate with avoidance/denial (Hopman & Rijken, ; Richardson et al, ) and poor quality of life (Ashley, Marti, Jones, Velikova, & Wright, ), while psychological distress has been linked to decreased quality of life and compliance with medical therapies (Vetter et al, ). Therefore, measures should be implemented to improve women's emotional status and their understanding of breast cancer.…”