2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ilmenite as alternative bed material for the combustion of coal and biomass blends in a fluidised bed combustor to improve combustion performance and reduce agglomeration tendency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments in a field test environment confirmed a CO reduction of up to 75% during a steady-state operation with wood pellets. Recent experiments conducted by Hughes et al [6,16] and Garcia et al [17] confirmed the CO reduction potential using ilmenite as bed material for biomass-based fluidized bed combustion. Additionally, steadystate laboratory tests with methane demonstrated the local shift of oxygen within the BFB as well as an increased gaseous fuel conversion directly in the fluidized bed [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The experiments in a field test environment confirmed a CO reduction of up to 75% during a steady-state operation with wood pellets. Recent experiments conducted by Hughes et al [6,16] and Garcia et al [17] confirmed the CO reduction potential using ilmenite as bed material for biomass-based fluidized bed combustion. Additionally, steadystate laboratory tests with methane demonstrated the local shift of oxygen within the BFB as well as an increased gaseous fuel conversion directly in the fluidized bed [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…6 d and 9 b indicate that the simultaneous application of ilmenite and silica sand particles in a fluidized bed combustor can help improve the bed material agglomeration resistance. Experimental findings indicated that considerably lower and smaller agglomerates were observed in a bubbling fluidized bed combustor of coal blended with wheat straw pellets when ilmenite was adopted as the bed material compared to silica sand [ 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the higher observed reactivity between the Fe 2 O 3 particles and the released VM might be caused by Fe 2 O 3 reacting with the combustible gases directly, whereas reactions with CuO were slower because of the competing process of oxygen uncoupling, possible locally when CuO particles were in the vicinity of combustible gases and the homogeneous combustion of CO and O 2 was slow (i.e., at 1023 K). Despite not releasing gaseous O 2 in the whole volume of the bed, the presence of non-CLOU OCs (here, Fe 2 O 3 ) was postulated to even out the spatial distribution of O 2 in the bed by the redox reactions with the combustible gases (CO) and the incoming O 2 from the fluidizing gas, a process that aligns with OCAC. Hence, Fe 2 O 3 is a good candidate for CLC or OCAC, while CuO is a good candidate for CLOU. A similar conclusion was drawn by Kajnas et al when using iron- and manganese-based OCs as bed materials to combust gaseous CO in an OCAC setup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%