2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00123.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Im)Migration Research in Italy: A European Comparative Perspective

Abstract: This article analyzes research on (im)migration in Italy since the early 1980s until the present as compared to research in other European receiving countries. Two periods are singled out. In the 1980s, the need to make sense of the dramatic Italian U-turn from an emigration to an immigration country prevails. Since the mid-1990s, some trends toward convergence emerge, following a number of theoretical and methodological challenges arising from North American research. Whereas for sociologist and anthropologis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cases, even if seemingly diverse, highlight a peculiarity of Italian policies for migrants: a lack of interest from national bodies and the outsourcing of settlement and welfare policies to local authorities and civil society's organisations (Caponio, 2008). Whereas sometimes such responsibilities are entrusted directly to local authorities, more often the civil society activates spontaneously to fill the gaps left by the national government (Caponio, 2008).…”
Section: Planning Informality and Immersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cases, even if seemingly diverse, highlight a peculiarity of Italian policies for migrants: a lack of interest from national bodies and the outsourcing of settlement and welfare policies to local authorities and civil society's organisations (Caponio, 2008). Whereas sometimes such responsibilities are entrusted directly to local authorities, more often the civil society activates spontaneously to fill the gaps left by the national government (Caponio, 2008).…”
Section: Planning Informality and Immersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases, even if seemingly diverse, highlight a peculiarity of Italian policies for migrants: a lack of interest from national bodies and the outsourcing of settlement and welfare policies to local authorities and civil society's organisations (Caponio, 2008). Whereas sometimes such responsibilities are entrusted directly to local authorities, more often the civil society activates spontaneously to fill the gaps left by the national government (Caponio, 2008). Against this backdrop, these two cases allow us to shed light on the forms of informal activation from civil society actors: On the one hand there are NGOs, ethnic organisations and voluntary associations that put in place informal but organized bottom-up practices; on the other hand, individuals or groups who mobilized through DIY practices of use of space.…”
Section: Planning Informality and Immersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and Australia (Mughan and Paxton ). To a lesser extent, literature is also available on newer countries of immigration, primarily in Western Europe, including Germany (Martin ), France (Fassin ), and Italy (Caponio ; Trinci ). The literature typically identifies two main schools of thought in considering public opinion toward immigration: contact theory and group threat theory.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Contact and Group Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research considering immigration in the developed world looks to countries that have historically received large numbers of immigrants, such as the United States (Brader et al 2008;Ha 2010), Canada (Bilodeau et al 2012), andAustralia (Mughan andPaxton 2006). To a lesser extent, literature is also available on newer countries of immigration, primarily in Western Europe, including Germany (Martin 2004), France (Fassin 2005), and Italy (Caponio 2008;Trinci 2004). The literature typically identifies two main schools of thought in considering public opinion toward immigration: contact theory and group threat theory.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Contact and Group Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article 1 is a contribution to the study of immigration politics and policy in Italy. As a review article has recently stressed (Caponio, 2008), while there is an abundance of literature analysing the socio-economic features of immigration into Italy and its historical development (e.g. Macioti and Pugliese, 2003; Sciortino and Colombo, 2004a), often in the broader context of immigration into southern European countries (King et al, 2000), the literature investigating Italian immigration policy/politics is still under-developed.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%