2010
DOI: 10.1364/oe.18.008207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image artifacts in hybrid imaging systems with a cubic phase mask

Abstract: We present the first analytical analysis of image artifacts in defocused hybrid imaging systems that employ a cubic phase-modulation function. We show that defocus artifacts have the form of image replications and are caused by a net phase modulation of the optical transfer function. Both numerical simulations and experimental images are presented that exhibit replication artifacts that are compatible with the analytical expressions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Translation, ρ, is parallel to the ξ η direction in the image plane and is proportional to W [2,7,9,23]. The value of optical defocus, W 20 , used to record an image can thus be determined by identifying the matchingW 20 that produces no displacement between the recovered images corresponding to ψ and ψ .…”
Section: Theory and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Translation, ρ, is parallel to the ξ η direction in the image plane and is proportional to W [2,7,9,23]. The value of optical defocus, W 20 , used to record an image can thus be determined by identifying the matchingW 20 that produces no displacement between the recovered images corresponding to ψ and ψ .…”
Section: Theory and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image recovery with a single kernel therefore introduces phase mismatches between the coding optical phasetransfer function (PTF) and the PTF of the digital filter used for image recovery, leading to range-dependent translation and image-replication artifacts [9]. It is perhaps for these reasons that practical exploitation of this so-called wavefront coding (WC) technique appears to have slowed in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though different inverse filtering strategies can be used to reduce this effect, the restoration process that reconstructs the MTF (recovering the diffraction limited properties of the system) includes noise amplification in the final images [6,7]. On the other hand, image quality is also reduced by the appearance of image restoration artefacts due to the mismatch between the actual wavefront that forms the image and the opticaltransfer-function (OTF) used in the digital processing stage to restore it [8]. Although the invariance provided by the PM makes this difference small, when applied to scenes with extension, artifacts will appear.…”
Section: Wavefront Coding Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, it has been shown how the defocus may also be estimated from the strength of the restoration artefacts within the wavefront coding strength [8]. However, again, this approach is proposed to deal with images affected by uniform defocus, and its reliability will be reduced as the ROI becomes smaller.…”
Section: Defocus Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation