2018
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image‐based retrospective 4D MRI in external beam radiotherapy: A comparative study with a digital phantom

Abstract: A comparison between three different image-based retrospective sorting methods for 4D MRI is proposed, providing guidelines for benchmark definition in MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(114 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation on the digital phantom highlighted better performance of the internal multiple/single point surrogates with respect to the external surrogate. Internal multiple/single point surrogates produced errors comparable to the ones of current state-of-the-art image-based retrospective sorting [30], confirming the capability of the proposed approach to derive accurate 4D MRI. Due to the lack of a ground truth 4D MRI for the patient dataset, the mutual information approach [17] was adopted as a reference to compare 4D MRI volumes reconstructed with surrogates which differed in dimensionality (single vs. multiple) and location (internal vs. external).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The validation on the digital phantom highlighted better performance of the internal multiple/single point surrogates with respect to the external surrogate. Internal multiple/single point surrogates produced errors comparable to the ones of current state-of-the-art image-based retrospective sorting [30], confirming the capability of the proposed approach to derive accurate 4D MRI. Due to the lack of a ground truth 4D MRI for the patient dataset, the mutual information approach [17] was adopted as a reference to compare 4D MRI volumes reconstructed with surrogates which differed in dimensionality (single vs. multiple) and location (internal vs. external).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Other state-of-the-art techniques, such as those based on body area, navigator slice or k-space surrogates were not investigated. During the separate acquisitions required for these techniques [30], different breathing patterns would occur, introducing uncertainty in the comparison of 4D MRI reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, 4DMRI allows utilizing an internal navigator as a respiratory surrogate, eliminating the uncertainty from an assumed external–internal motion correlation of an external surrogate used in the 4DCT acquisition. Thus, a navigator‐triggered/binned 4DMRI has higher image quality with fewer and less severe binning artifacts . Furthermore, MRI provides the option of the nonaxial scanning direction, such as sagittal or coronal scans, which are more desirable for characterizing tumor/organ respiratory motion .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual biofeedback was compared against a free-breathing acquisition (To et al 2016b), whereas a direct comparison of an internal surrogate (1D navigator) with a concurrently acquired external surrogate was reported (Li et al 2016). Multi-slice 2D acquisition based on navigator approaches can substantially reduce image artefacts compared with some of the image-derived approaches (Paganelli et al 2018) and could describe intra-cycle variations more effectively (Von Siebenthal et al 2007). One limitation of the navigator methods, however, is that they would require sequence modification and may result in longer acquisition time, which is instead overcome by image-based approaches exploiting slice acquisition modality without a navigator.…”
Section: Respiratory-correlated (4d) Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%