2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image corporelle et grossesse : examen des propriétés psychométriques de la traduction française de la Pregnancy and Weight Gain Attitude Scale (PWGAS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factor analysis confirmed five factors (negative attitude towards the increase of gestational weight, positive body image, control of gestational weight, concern about gestational weight, and restrictive behavior in response to gestational weight) through 18 items. The aforementioned dimensions explain 56% with adjustable indices, which is higher than the values in the model proposed by DiPietro et al (2003) and Rousseau et al (2016). RMSEA p = unilateral probability on the right hand for the null hypothesis that RMSEA will be ≤ .05; Δ χ 2 = difference between χ2 statistics of the two models compared; p of Δ χ 2 = unilateral probability on the right hand for the null hypothesis; ΔIFI = difference between IFI of the two models compared; ΔCFI = difference between CFIs of the two models compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Factor analysis confirmed five factors (negative attitude towards the increase of gestational weight, positive body image, control of gestational weight, concern about gestational weight, and restrictive behavior in response to gestational weight) through 18 items. The aforementioned dimensions explain 56% with adjustable indices, which is higher than the values in the model proposed by DiPietro et al (2003) and Rousseau et al (2016). RMSEA p = unilateral probability on the right hand for the null hypothesis that RMSEA will be ≤ .05; Δ χ 2 = difference between χ2 statistics of the two models compared; p of Δ χ 2 = unilateral probability on the right hand for the null hypothesis; ΔIFI = difference between IFI of the two models compared; ΔCFI = difference between CFIs of the two models compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Continuing with the description of the dimensions of this study, dimension four, called "concern about weight gain" includes three items, coinciding with the sphere of fear of weight gain in the model proposed by Rousseau et al (2016). This dimension coincides with the concern over appearance in pregnancy scale, given that one of the items asked whether women had restricted the amount of food they ate during pregnancy in order to feel thinner (Nagl, Jepsen, Linde, & Kersting, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations