2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3108571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Defocus in an Airborne UWB VHR Microwave Photonic SAR: Analysis and Compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article will validate the proposed algorithm in airborne mode [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The system parameters are set as follows: flight altitude of 5000m, flight speed of 120m/s, downward viewing angle of 60 degrees, system carrier frequency of 9.6GHz, effective length of azimuth antenna Da=0.6m, pulse width Tp=10e-6s, frequency modulation bandwidth Br=50e6Hz, mixing factor V_ Retio=1/2, system PRF is 600Hz, and system azimuth bandwidth is 936.383Hz.…”
Section: Simulation Verification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This article will validate the proposed algorithm in airborne mode [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The system parameters are set as follows: flight altitude of 5000m, flight speed of 120m/s, downward viewing angle of 60 degrees, system carrier frequency of 9.6GHz, effective length of azimuth antenna Da=0.6m, pulse width Tp=10e-6s, frequency modulation bandwidth Br=50e6Hz, mixing factor V_ Retio=1/2, system PRF is 600Hz, and system azimuth bandwidth is 936.383Hz.…”
Section: Simulation Verification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The latter three types of errors are all caused by the SAR system itself, so we refer to them as systematical errors. So far, most of the existing autofocus methods focused on the influence of motion errors, but only a few concerned the systematical errors [9]. Therefore, for MWP SAR, it is demanding to develop an imaging method that takes the unknown systematical errors into consideration and is capable of compensating for them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33] and [34], the analytical structure of the phase error is explored, and a semi-blind method for 2-D phase error estimation and compensation is proposed, but they are based on the models considering only the motion errors. In [9], a 2-D autofocus strategy accounting for systematical errors in MWP SAR systems is developed. However, it just compensates for the range envelope error, i.e., 1st-order phase error in the range dimension, which is powerless to range defocus related to 2nd and even higher-order phase errors in the range dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion errors usually consist of an envelope error and a phase one, and both types of errors satisfy the linear mapping relationship, that is, the ratio of the phase error to the envelope error is 4π/. Some researchers calculate the phase error by estimating the envelope error [14][15][16][17], but others convert the phase error estimated by phase autofocusing methods into the envelope error [2,6,18,19]. In the first class methods, the cross-correlation method based on oversampled data of range profiles is employed to estimate the envelope error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [24] use the SA image coherent superposition to achieve high-resolution real-time imaging for spotlight SAR. Xu et al [17] estimate the azimuth SA envelope and phase errors by the cross-correlation-based algorithm and map-drift method in the range-Doppler domain. Hai et al [25] propose an optimal SA division method to guarantee the coherence of each SA data in the Back-Projection imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%