2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccic.2014.7238350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image denoising using wavelet transform and wiener filter based on log energy distribution over Poisson-Gaussian noise model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boyat and Joshi [18] practiced image denoising using the Poisson Gaussian noise model. They also employed the integration of the Wiener filter in a wavelet domain depending on the log energy distribution method to the denoised image corrupted by Poisson Gaussian noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyat and Joshi [18] practiced image denoising using the Poisson Gaussian noise model. They also employed the integration of the Wiener filter in a wavelet domain depending on the log energy distribution method to the denoised image corrupted by Poisson Gaussian noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper introduces the two most fantastic noise models, jointly called as Poisson-Gaussian noise model. These two noise models are specified the quality of MRI recipient signal in terms of visual appearances and strength [21]. Despite from the highest quality MRI processing, above model describes the set of parameters of the Poisson-Gaussian noise corrupted test image.…”
Section: Poisson-gaussian Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sophisticated methods are often formulated as iterative algorithms and variational models, with a variety of data fidelity and regularization terms being proposed in literature. The most common approaches are (regularized) inverse filtering, including, e.g., Wiener filtering [ 8 , 9 ] and (regularized) Lucy–Richardson (LR) deconvolution [ 10 , 11 ]. For an overview, please refer to, e.g., [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%