2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-Detected Breast Cancer: State of the Art Diagnosis and Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ASLN was examined intraoperatively with imprint cytology (touch preparation) and frozen section [24]. Those had positive axilla nodes (fine needle aspiration) before NAC (cN+) and converted to clinically (palpation and ultrasound) node-negative disease after NAC (ycN0) underwent ASLNB following ALND.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASLN was examined intraoperatively with imprint cytology (touch preparation) and frozen section [24]. Those had positive axilla nodes (fine needle aspiration) before NAC (cN+) and converted to clinically (palpation and ultrasound) node-negative disease after NAC (ycN0) underwent ASLNB following ALND.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general rule, 80 g of breast tissue is the maximum weight that can be removed from a medium-sized breast without resulting in deformity. Although the average specimen from BCS weighs 20–40 g, all OPS studies have demonstrated that an average of 200 g up to 1 000 g or more can be removed from a medium to large-sized breast during BCS with no cosmetic compromises [10]. In 2010, Clough et al [11] developed an Atlas and OPS guideline to assist surgeons in choosing the optimal approach for each individual patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rising incidence of DCIS diagnoses, it is important to understand variations in patterns of presentation and management of this disease in different racial/ethnic groups. With the increased use of screening mammography in the United States, an increased incidence of DCIS was observed in the 1980's across all ethnicities [18]- [21]. Innos and Horn-Ross analyzed data from the California Cancer Registry (1988-1999) looking at racial/ethnic differences and trends in the incidence of DCIS in 11,798 California women and found that the percentages of DCIS across races were similar between White (11.9%), Black (11.9%), Hispanic (10.8%) and Asian-Pacific Islander (14.9%) women [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%