2013
DOI: 10.5120/11508-7226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Encryption using Pseudo Random Number Generators

Abstract: Image encryption is conversion of image to a distorted form so that it can be secured from unauthorized users. This paper implements and investigates two methods for image encryption. First technique is encryption of image by linear congruential generator. Random numbers are generated by Linear congruential generator. These numbers are used as index for shuffling of rows, columns and pixels of an image. Second technique uses logistic maps to generate random number sequences. These random numbers are used as in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained are representing that three generators used in encryption gave better results than other studies. In Banthia and Tiwari (2013), the lowest value by LCG is 0.0019 compared with our result, which shows the three generators of our study as better affectivity. The following three values are 0.0016,-0.0018, and -4.9958e-04 smaller correlation are the values we got compared to the other study in Banthia and Tiwari (2013) that used the LCG generator, while the value of the same study using Logistic map 9.72E-05 was the smallest compared to the results we received.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained are representing that three generators used in encryption gave better results than other studies. In Banthia and Tiwari (2013), the lowest value by LCG is 0.0019 compared with our result, which shows the three generators of our study as better affectivity. The following three values are 0.0016,-0.0018, and -4.9958e-04 smaller correlation are the values we got compared to the other study in Banthia and Tiwari (2013) that used the LCG generator, while the value of the same study using Logistic map 9.72E-05 was the smallest compared to the results we received.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In Banthia and Tiwari (2013), the lowest value by LCG is 0.0019 compared with our result, which shows the three generators of our study as better affectivity. The following three values are 0.0016,-0.0018, and -4.9958e-04 smaller correlation are the values we got compared to the other study in Banthia and Tiwari (2013) that used the LCG generator, while the value of the same study using Logistic map 9.72E-05 was the smallest compared to the results we received. When comparing our results with the second study (Rohith et al, 2014), all the generators we used gave the smallest values compared to the Logistic map method.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At present, many image encryption algorithms are produced [3][4][5][6] trying to convert the image to unintelligible form that is hard to understand. The term "Fractal" was proposed by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%