1992
DOI: 10.1002/app.1992.070460116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image enhancement of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane surface structure for atomic force microscopy

Abstract: SYNOPSISThe surface topography and pore structure of ultrafiltration membranes can be investigated with atomic force microscopy. In this study, it was found that the substitution of ethanol for water as the immersion medium improved the resolution of the fine structure of 10K polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Pores in the membrane surface from 7 to 9 nm in diameter were measured, which coincides with the range expected for 10,000 molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) ultrafiltration membranes. It is believe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore expect to find pores smaller than 3.7 nm. Our observed pore size, 3 nm, is consistent with our expectations and that observed by Tong et al (1996) who also imaged polysulfone membranes with a 10 kg/mol MWCO, yet not with the findings of Fritzsche et al (1992b), who reported pores of 7-9 nm in diameter in polyethersulfone UF membranes, nor with the results of Dietz et al (1991) who reported 15-30 nm pores and 12.6-18.8 nm pores (Dietz et al 1992) for membranes of the same MWCO.…”
Section: Discussion and Reviewsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We therefore expect to find pores smaller than 3.7 nm. Our observed pore size, 3 nm, is consistent with our expectations and that observed by Tong et al (1996) who also imaged polysulfone membranes with a 10 kg/mol MWCO, yet not with the findings of Fritzsche et al (1992b), who reported pores of 7-9 nm in diameter in polyethersulfone UF membranes, nor with the results of Dietz et al (1991) who reported 15-30 nm pores and 12.6-18.8 nm pores (Dietz et al 1992) for membranes of the same MWCO.…”
Section: Discussion and Reviewsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The observed difference may also be linked to differences in sample preparation techniques. The measurements by Fritzsche et al (1992b) were performed in ethanol rather than in water (used by Tong et al and this study). Polysulfones can absorb 22% water within a 24-h period (Billmeyer 1984).…”
Section: Discussion and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic force microscopy has often been used for characterization of pore structure and surface morphology of polymeric membranes 17, 34–43. Although even the highest achievable resolutions of AFM are not sufficient to observe features, which directly control gas transport properties of polymeric films, the comparison of AFM images is thought to be useful in accessing the effect of solvent on surface morphology of polymeric films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane was placed in ethanol before examination because this approach improved the resolution of the AFM image. 13 The performance of the membranes was tested by UF experiments in a flat sheet module with an effective membrane area of 112 cm 2 and a 0.4-cm channel height. The transport properties of the membrane with reference to water and the BSA solution (0.75 g/dm 3 ) were tested at a constant The potential of the membrane was measured by the Dip cell method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%