2014
DOI: 10.3390/e16116099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Fusion Based on the \({\Delta ^{ - 1}} - T{V_0}\) Energy Function

Abstract: This article proposes a ∆ −1 − T V 0 energy function to fuse a multi-spectral image with a panchromatic image. The proposed energy function consists of two components, a T V 0 component and a ∆ −1 component. The T V 0 term uses the sparse priority to increase the detailed spatial information; while the ∆ −1 term removes the block effect of the multi-spectral image. Furthermore, as the proposed energy function is non-convex, we also adopt an alternative minimization algorithm and the L 0 gradient minimization t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, λ 0 , λ max , κ 1 , ϕ are set to 0.09, 100, 1.5, 5, respectively. This method has been proved to be effective in accelerating convergence [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: P Sparse Regularization Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiment, λ 0 , λ max , κ 1 , ϕ are set to 0.09, 100, 1.5, 5, respectively. This method has been proved to be effective in accelerating convergence [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: P Sparse Regularization Optimization Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VO methods approach pan-sharpening as an inverse optimization problem whereby a fused image is derived by generating an energy functional from the input MS and PAN images that is then passed into an optimization algorithm. In other words, VO methods focus on building the most effective and suitable models to characterize the correlation between the spectral information from the MS image with the spatial information in the PAN image [5,[7][8][9]. A review of current industrystandard GIS software revealed that VO methods have yet to be widely adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in [29] that under certain RIP condition of A, L q -norm minimization algorithms require fewer sampling data but gain a better recovery performance than L 1 -norm minimization algorithms. Moreover, the sufficient conditions in terms of RIP for L qnorm minimization are weaker than those for L 1 -norm minimization [30,31]. However, in general, relative to L 1 -norm minimization, L q -norm minimization is more difficult to directly tackle due to its nonsmoothing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%