2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1006021107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-matching during ant navigation occurs through saccade-like body turns controlled by learned visual features

Abstract: Visual memories of landmarks play a major role in guiding the habitual foraging routes of ants and bees, but how these memories engage visuo-motor control systems during guidance is poorly understood. We approach this problem through a study of image matching, a navigational strategy in which insects reach a familiar place by moving so that their current retinal image transforms to match a memorized snapshot of the scene viewed from that place. Analysis of how navigating wood ants correct their course when clo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our comparatively coarse analysis of gaze directions in M. croslandi ants cannot be easily reconciled with the findings by Lent et al [24] that wood ants perform very targeted and pre-calculated saccadic body rotations to minimize the angular difference between the retinal position of a salient edge that defines the location of a target feeder and the position of that edge in the memorized view. First, our ants tend to make many saccades into the same direction before reversing scanning direction (figures 3 and 7c), and thus do not appear to align individual features in the panorama with a memorized view.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The results of our comparatively coarse analysis of gaze directions in M. croslandi ants cannot be easily reconciled with the findings by Lent et al [24] that wood ants perform very targeted and pre-calculated saccadic body rotations to minimize the angular difference between the retinal position of a salient edge that defines the location of a target feeder and the position of that edge in the memorized view. First, our ants tend to make many saccades into the same direction before reversing scanning direction (figures 3 and 7c), and thus do not appear to align individual features in the panorama with a memorized view.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The jump induces a transient increase in the frequency of SLTs (figure 4b). SLTs evoked this way have similar properties to spontaneous SLTs [41] and are delayed until ants reach the point of a zig or zag in which they normally face the goal (figure 4c). This delay makes it possible to show that the ant's direction of travel, as given by its mean body orientation over a complete zigzag cycle, is linked more tightly to the performance of SLTs than to the jump of the visual pattern [33].…”
Section: Intermittent Visual Control and The Wood Ants' Zigzag Pathmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The initial segment of the route can be sustained without much need for further SLTs. In contrast, the ants in the experiment of figure 2 were trained over a 1.2 m route to approach a feeder that lay very close to a black rectangle on an LCD screen and inset 15 cm from one edge [41]. Ants tended to take a straight path and generated SLTs almost to the feeder, indicating that they are guided actively over the whole of this route.…”
Section: Visual Features That Control the Ant's Saccade-like Turnsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By rotating so as to align the current retinal view with retinotopic visual memories acquired on previous trips, an individual will automatically travel in the habitual directions from points along a route [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This widely used mechanism can be termed 'alignment image-matching' [11,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%