2013 13th International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1109/robotica.2013.6623521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image processing using Pearson's correlation coefficient: Applications on autonomous robotics

Abstract: Autonomous robots have motivated researchers from different groups due to the challenge that it represents. Many applications for control of autonomous platform are being developed and one important aspect is the excess of information, frequently redundant, that imposes a great computational cost in data processing. Taking into account the temporal coherence between consecutive frames, we have proposed a set of tools based on Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC): (i) a Discarding Criteria methodology was pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another variant of \IDi®Net" was that it utilized negative Pearson correlation coe±cient (NPCC) as the loss function to replace the conventional MAE strategy because NPCC performed better for spatially sparse objects and strong scattering conditions. 45 Experiments with one of two di®erent di®users and training inputs, which were extracted from one of three databases (Faces-LFW, 46 ImageNet, 47 and MNIST 43 ) for each time, were carried out to validate the proposed method. The training size was 10,000 each time.…”
Section: Deep Learning Methods For Optical Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another variant of \IDi®Net" was that it utilized negative Pearson correlation coe±cient (NPCC) as the loss function to replace the conventional MAE strategy because NPCC performed better for spatially sparse objects and strong scattering conditions. 45 Experiments with one of two di®erent di®users and training inputs, which were extracted from one of three databases (Faces-LFW, 46 ImageNet, 47 and MNIST 43 ) for each time, were carried out to validate the proposed method. The training size was 10,000 each time.…”
Section: Deep Learning Methods For Optical Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DIC value measurement follows Eq. 1 which is Pearson's Correlation Coefficient where fi and gi are the intensity of the i th pixel in the 1 st image and 2 nd image respectively, fmean and gmean are the mean intensity of the 1 st image and 2 nd image consecutively [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearson's Correlation (PC) [26]: It gives the measure of how likely it is possible to infer a map from another and it is applied only for occupied space. According to [21] this metric suffers from two drawbacks, one because it requires similar occupied pixels between maps, and the other is that it is perturbed by the outliers (e.g, [27]…”
Section: Benchmarking Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%