2008 Second Asia International Conference on Modelling &Amp; Simulation (AMS) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ams.2008.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Quality Assessments and Restoration for Face Detection and Recognition System Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…without any reference images, as the method in [32], or learnt knowledge from previous data sets such as in [33]; (ii) it is content-independent, i.e. the value of image quality can still reflect well the blur level of different frames while the content in the video changes, except for some extreme cases; (iii) it works with unknown blur model, i.e.…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…without any reference images, as the method in [32], or learnt knowledge from previous data sets such as in [33]; (ii) it is content-independent, i.e. the value of image quality can still reflect well the blur level of different frames while the content in the video changes, except for some extreme cases; (iii) it works with unknown blur model, i.e.…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esparragon et al [6] implemented an automatic quality measurement tool, which included these functions. Although there may be various quality problems with images, such as shadows, hot spots, video artefacts, blurring, distortions, blockiness, random noise and movement [8,15,32], we are only concerned here with image blurring, since this is the artefact that predominantly affects the result of super-resolution. Blur also influences the automation, robustness and efficiency of many visual systems, like systems for visual surveillance and 3D reconstruction.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While factors such as illumination, pose variation, blur and focus change may drastically deteriorate recognition precision [1], thus it is necessary to take these factors into account to automatically evaluate quality of facial images. For general IQA, there are several most popular full-reference schemes such as the Mean Squared Error (MSE) [2], Peak Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (PSNR) [3], the SSIM index [4] and Tone Rendering Distortion Index (TRDI) [5], but they all need reference images which are hard to obtain in practical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such issue is that facial recognition tools are in general not efficient for poor quality facial images, e.g. in the presence of shadows, artifacts, and blurring (Zamani et al, 2008;Zhao et al, 2003;Castillo, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%