2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep28962
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy

Abstract: Automated analysis of microscope images is necessitated by the increased need for high-resolution follow up of events in time. Manually finding the right images to be analyzed, or eliminated from data analysis are common day-to-day problems in microscopy research today, and the constantly growing size of image datasets does not help the matter. We propose a simple method and a software tool for sorting images within a dataset, according to their relative quality. We demonstrate the applicability of our method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High entropy values indicate high contrast/noisy images while low values indicate lower contrast. These image quality measures were created with PyImq (Koho et al, 2016). Random effects linear models were created with the R package lme4 (Bates et al, 2014) by fitting log precision to taxonomic family, magnification, and imaging technique as factors.…”
Section: Manualcount Automaticcountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High entropy values indicate high contrast/noisy images while low values indicate lower contrast. These image quality measures were created with PyImq (Koho et al, 2016). Random effects linear models were created with the R package lme4 (Bates et al, 2014) by fitting log precision to taxonomic family, magnification, and imaging technique as factors.…”
Section: Manualcount Automaticcountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquiring high quality optical microscopy images reliably can be a challenge for biologists, since individual images can be noisy, poorly exposed, out-of-focus, vignetted or unevenly illuminated, or contain dust artifacts. These types of image degradation may occur on only a small fraction of a dataset too large to survey manually, especially in high-content screening applications [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the application of such NR-IQA metrics to microscopy data sets may lead to unpredictable results. Although a number of microscopy oriented NR-IQA approaches have been reported 30 34 , these were mainly developed to address very specific applications, what might generate similar concerns over their reliability and predictability when used in other scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, the use of NR-IQA methods in combination with PSHG data sets represents a subject that has not been previously addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%