CVPR 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image ranking and retrieval based on multi-attribute queries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
234
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
234
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To retrieve images given a query, our model considers the evidence from all object detectors, not just detectors for objects in the query. Similar ideas have been used in [11] for multi-attribute image retrieval. The difference from [11] is that, in addition to object names, our query also considers certain relations between objects.…”
Section: Structured Object Query Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To retrieve images given a query, our model considers the evidence from all object detectors, not just detectors for objects in the query. Similar ideas have been used in [11] for multi-attribute image retrieval. The difference from [11] is that, in addition to object names, our query also considers certain relations between objects.…”
Section: Structured Object Query Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, our work considers a more detailed phrase-level representation of queries, and explicitly models the spatial layout of objects. Moreover, we do not assume the existence of reliable detectors as in [11]. Instead, the object locations are treated as latent variables that are implicitly inferred simultaneously with image retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual attributes are semantic properties of objects (e.g., "fuzzy", "plastic") that serve as a middle ground between low-level features (e.g., color, texture) and high-level categories. Attributes (or "concepts", their counterpart in multimedia retrieval) are known to provide an effective representation for image search [15,10,20,22,4,8,25,7], especially since they permit content-based keyword queries [10,22,7]. While often treated as categorical ("is smiling" vs. "is not smiling"), attributes can more generally be modeled as continuous or relative properties ("is smiling more than X") [16,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that sharing information between words is extremely important to learn good discriminative representations, and that the use of attributes is one way to achieve this goal. Attributes are semantic properties that can be used to describe images and categories [6], and have recently gained a lot of popularity for image retrieval and classification tasks [6,15,31,32]. Attributes have also shown ability to transfer information in zero-shot learning settings [15] and have been used for feature compression since they usually provide compact descriptors.…”
Section: Supervised Word Representation With Phoc Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%