2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image reconstruction with laterally truncated projections in helical cone-beam CT: Linear prediction based projection completion techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several strategies have been developed to suppress the artefacts in RoI tomography. Truncated tomography comprises various techniques to extrapolate the truncated projections (Lewitt & Bates, 1978a,b; Ogawa et al , 1984; Sahiner & Yagle, 1995; Ohnesorge et al , 2000; Gea et al , 2005; Anoop & Rajgopal, 2009) as well as methods based on wavelets (Olson & DeStefano, 1994; Bonnet et al , 2000; Hsung & Lun, 2000). Lambda tomography (Smith & Keinert, 1985; Spyra et al , 1990; Faridani et al, 1992, 1997) uses the second derivative of the projections, whereas the Hilbert transform‐based methods (Noo et al , 2004; Clackdoyle et al , 2004; Defrise et al , 2006; Ye et al , 2007a,b) are based on the first derivative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies have been developed to suppress the artefacts in RoI tomography. Truncated tomography comprises various techniques to extrapolate the truncated projections (Lewitt & Bates, 1978a,b; Ogawa et al , 1984; Sahiner & Yagle, 1995; Ohnesorge et al , 2000; Gea et al , 2005; Anoop & Rajgopal, 2009) as well as methods based on wavelets (Olson & DeStefano, 1994; Bonnet et al , 2000; Hsung & Lun, 2000). Lambda tomography (Smith & Keinert, 1985; Spyra et al , 1990; Faridani et al, 1992, 1997) uses the second derivative of the projections, whereas the Hilbert transform‐based methods (Noo et al , 2004; Clackdoyle et al , 2004; Defrise et al , 2006; Ye et al , 2007a,b) are based on the first derivative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the standard Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) reconstruction algorithm (Feldkamp et al 1984) leads to truncation artifacts under this circumstance, great efforts have been made over the years to improve image quality in this so-called interior tomography problem. Examples include interchanging the orders of back-projection and differential operators (Noo et al 2004, Tang et al 2006, Cho et al 2008, Dennerlein and Maier 2013, extrapolating truncated projection data (Rajgopal and Anoop 2006), borrowing prior information to ensure the uniqueness of the solution (Ye et al 2007, Yu et al 2008 or taking advantages of compressed sensing approaches (Yu and Wang 2009). Nonetheless, reconstructing the image inside ROI alone cannot meet the requirements of radiotherapy, particularly in ART.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%