2012
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2011.0345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image restoration and decomposition using non-convex non-smooth regularisation and negative Hilbert–Sobolev norm

Abstract: A new model for image restoration and decomposition has been presented here. The proposed model applies the non-convex non-smooth regularisation and the Hilbert -Sobolev spaces of negative degree of differentiability to capture oscillatory patterns. The existence of a pseudosolution to the proposed model is proved. Moreover, two numerical algorithms for solving the minimisation problem are provided by applying the variable splitting and the penalty techniques. Finally, extended experiments on denoising, deblur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another intriguing new application for the ℓ 1 sparseness-inducing penalty is compressive sensing (CS) [16][17][18] when A is the measurement or sampling operator in the optimization problem (3). In addition, it is worth mentioning the numerical results in [19,20] and theoretical works [21][22][23]. These results have justified that the robustness of restored images to noise and the nonsparsity can be increased by replacing ℓ 1 norm in (3) with the nonconvex nonsmooth ℓ (0 < < 1) quasinorm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Another intriguing new application for the ℓ 1 sparseness-inducing penalty is compressive sensing (CS) [16][17][18] when A is the measurement or sampling operator in the optimization problem (3). In addition, it is worth mentioning the numerical results in [19,20] and theoretical works [21][22][23]. These results have justified that the robustness of restored images to noise and the nonsparsity can be increased by replacing ℓ 1 norm in (3) with the nonconvex nonsmooth ℓ (0 < < 1) quasinorm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This is because unlike synthetic deblurring, real deblurring often suffers from noise and ringing effects. The blurred images may have been degraded by arbitrarily shaped PSFs that are complex and cannot be easily modelled (Gupta et al, 2010;Harmeling et al, 2011;Lu, 2012;Whyte et al, 2011;Yuquan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convex formulations benefit from convex optimization theory which leads to robust algorithms with guaranteed convergence. On the other hand, non-smooth, non-convex regularization has remarkable advantages over convex regularization for restoring images, in particular to restore high-quality piecewise constant images with neat edges [16], [22]. However, it may lead to challenging computation since it requires non-convex non-smooth minimization which, involving many minima, can often get stuck in shallow local minima.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%