2014
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2014.2324277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Set-Based Collaborative Representation for Face Recognition

Abstract: With the rapid development of digital imaging and communication technologies, image set based face recognition (ISFR) is becoming increasingly important. One key issue of ISFR is how to effectively and efficiently represent the query face image set by using the gallery face image sets. The set-to-set distance based methods ignore the relationship between gallery sets, while representing the query set images individually over the gallery sets ignores the correlation between query set images. In this paper, we p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These modeling methods usually rely on learning of sparse or collaborative representation coefficients. For instance, in the ISCRC [3] algorithm, each probe image set or video was modeled as affine or convex hulls; then, these models were collaboratively reconstructed using all gallery image sets or videos. In the RNP [4] algorithm, the image sets were also modeled as affine hulls.…”
Section: Dynamic Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These modeling methods usually rely on learning of sparse or collaborative representation coefficients. For instance, in the ISCRC [3] algorithm, each probe image set or video was modeled as affine or convex hulls; then, these models were collaboratively reconstructed using all gallery image sets or videos. In the RNP [4] algorithm, the image sets were also modeled as affine hulls.…”
Section: Dynamic Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, many research works have been made in computer vision [7][8][9][10][11], especially in the image set classification [1][2][3][4][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] field. In this subsection, as shown in Figure 2, we briefly review two types of image set classification methods: static and dynamic modeling methods.…”
Section: Image Set Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In solving the nonlinear problems encountered in image classification, the KAHISD/KCHISD of the Cevikalp and Triggs [31] article is an extension of the affine/convex hull-based image classification task to its kernel version. Zhu et al [32] proposed the KCH-ISCRC with kernel tricks, which well addresses collaborative image set-based representation and classification (ISCRC). It is easy to see that Gaussian kernels can successfully solve nonlinear problems in various applications [28,29,31,32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attainment of effectiveness in set based facial recognition methodologies relies on the consideration of two pivotal factors: the selection of models tasked with approximating facial image sets, and the discernment of an appropriate distance metric designated for the quantification of similarity among these models. In this vein, a multitude of distinct models for image sets have been introduced, encompassing linear and affine subspaces [1][2][3][4], convex hulls [1,5,6], Gaussian mixture models [7], Grassmannian manifolds [8,9], as well as manifolds comprised of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices [10,11]. These model formulations have been advanced to approximate image sets while concurrently establishing congruous similarity metrics tailored to each respective model instantiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%