2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-7408-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image splicing localization using noise distribution characteristic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional methods are based on handcrafted features. According to the types of the handcrafted features, the traditional methods can also be divided into four categories: JPEG‐based [ 5 , 6 ] , device‐based [ 7 , 8 ] , post‐processing‐based [ 9 , 10 ] and physically‐based [ 11 , 12 ] . However, the handcrafted features limit the generalization ability of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional methods are based on handcrafted features. According to the types of the handcrafted features, the traditional methods can also be divided into four categories: JPEG‐based [ 5 , 6 ] , device‐based [ 7 , 8 ] , post‐processing‐based [ 9 , 10 ] and physically‐based [ 11 , 12 ] . However, the handcrafted features limit the generalization ability of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 We tested the proposed method on the Columbia dataset (Ng et al 2004) to evaluate the detection accuracy of spliced regions. We took four splicing images from Columbia and tested the detection accuracy rate of our method on these images and the methods proposed by Pan et al (2011), Lyu et al (2014, Zeng et al (2017), Mahdian and Saic (2009) and Zhang et al (2019). Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth row shows the detection result of the method proposed by Zeng et al (2017), and the sixth row shows the detection of the results of the method proposed by Mahdian and Saic (2009), the spliced regions are marked in the green grid, and falsely detections are marked with a red grid. The seventh row shows the detection result of the method proposed by Zhang et al (2019), and spliced regions are marked with white.…”
Section: Experimental Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A general method of operation detection based on deep learning was proposed by (Bayar, 2016), which detects mean filtering, Gaussian blurring, resampling, and Gaussian white noise image forgery. The existing methods for image visual content tampering and location mainly use cues such as local noise features Zhang et al, 2019) and colour filter array (CFA) mode (Ferrara et al, 2012;Wang, Niu, & Zhang, 2020), to classify specific image patches or pixels in the image as tampered or not tampered, and thus, the ability to locate tampered areas (Bondi, Baroffio, et al, 2017;Huh et al, 2018;Pengpeng et al, 2017). In recent years, deep learning technology has been applied to image tamper detection and has achieved good results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%