“…For example, there is the progressive widening of scope seen in ‘inter-art’ studies of all kinds as these extend from literature into transmediality (Elleström, 2014) and the steady growth of narratology to apply as a means of analysis for films, static visual narratives, computer games and, again, many more (Ryan, 2005; Wolf, 2007). Moreover, whereas these examples all generally reflect an extension away from disciplines with core foci on verbal language, there are also moves within approaches previously focused within static visual depictions, such as art history, to increasingly consider ‘other’ signifying practices, such as the incorporation of (written) language, combinations with music, moving images, as well as more diverse uses of pictorial materials, stretching into traditionally quite distinct areas such as information visualisation and scientific argument (Manghani, 2013). Against this backdrop, we might easily go so far, as Mitchell has famously proclaimed, as to doubt the existence of any ‘purely’ visual media at all (Mitchell, 2005); and, indeed, as Duncum (2004: 258) reminds us, visual culture ‘was never exclusively visual’.…”