2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10584-0_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image Tag Completion by Noisy Matrix Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key difference is that the main objective of our model is to segment a set of test images without any labels rather than segmenting the weakly-labelled training images. Moreover, our work is also related to image tagging works such as [20], [21], [43] which learn a model from noisy user-provided image-level labels as well. However, the problem tackled here is harder as we aim to simultaneously segment images and label each segment, rather than labelling the whole images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key difference is that the main objective of our model is to segment a set of test images without any labels rather than segmenting the weakly-labelled training images. Moreover, our work is also related to image tagging works such as [20], [21], [43] which learn a model from noisy user-provided image-level labels as well. However, the problem tackled here is harder as we aim to simultaneously segment images and label each segment, rather than labelling the whole images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is further compounded when the image-level weak labels also contain noise -particularly when the user-provided tags (e.g. those from Flickr) are used as labels for model training [20], [21]. In addition, many existing methods [11], [12], [17]- [19] need to use predicted image-level labels for the test images as model input, which again are noisy due to imperfect prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, users often avoid assigning tags to images, making image tags incomplete. To deal with noisy and incomplete tags, several completion methods [2,3,7] have been recently proposed, Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tags are provided by users in the form of free text and they are usually imprecise, containing noise to efficiently describe the visual content of images [2,7]. Meanwhile, users often avoid assigning tags to images, making image tags incomplete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image tag assignment strives to assign a number of tags related to the image content to unlabeled images [2,20,21,22]. Image tag refinement aims to remove irrelevant tags from the initial tag list and enrich it with novel, yet relevant tags [23,24,25]. Inspired by the technologies used in image tagging, we will use the co-regularization framework, as shown in figure 1, to fast and automatically tag large natural sounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%