Imagerie de la maladie de Crohn

Oudjit, A.; Koudjowa, A.; Bahurel, H.; Silvera, S.; Gouya, H.; Millischer, A.-E.; Augui, J.; Vignaux, O.; D'izarn, J. J. S.; Legmann, P.; Hoeffel, C.

doi:10.1016/s1879-8527(06)74710-4

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Endoscopy for ulceration is much more sensitive than imaging with a mismatch in favor of endoscopy (Kappa: 0.012 and p: 0524). This could be explained by the mode that ulcers are superficial lesions and the capability of the imaging method for detecting the mucosal lesions (ulcers and earlier damage) is generally low [25]. However, this concordance rate is average when it concerns the study of stenosis and fistulas (Kappa 0.56 and 0.42 with p = 0.000 for both lesions).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is there a correlation between endoscopy and imaging findings in Crohn’s disease

Charif¹,

Abid²,

Benajah³

et al. 2013

OJGas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims: Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Endoscopy and radiology play an important role in the diagnosis and management of this specific disease. The ability of each of these two tests to detect the gastrointestinal involvement (ulceration, stenosis, fistula, polyp, mucosal thickening) varies according to the type of Crohn's lesions. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the correlation between these two diagnostic methods in the detection of those specific lesions in 70 patients diagnosed with Crohn's Disease (CD) during the period of 3 years. Methods: In this retrospective study, including 70 patients with Crohn's disease, Four major characteristic lesions (ulceration, stenosis, fistula and polyps) were studied by endoscopy and radiological exams to evaluate the relationship between endoscopy and imaging findings in the detection of these lesions. The analysis of our results was made by statistical analysis system: EpiInfo and SPSS. Results: The concordance of each of these diagnostic modalities is average for stenosis and fistulas and low diagnostic significance for ulcers and polyps. However, the imaging features of mucosal thickening are sensitive but not specific.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%