2018
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imagery interventions in health behavior: A meta-analysis.

Abstract: Results support effects of mental imagery interventions on health behaviors, identify conditions in which they may be more effective, and point to how future imagery interventions might be optimized. (PsycINFO Database Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
67
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(76 reference statements)
6
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, participants were required to actively acknowledge they endorsed the position advocated in the materials. Similarly, building on imagery intervention research (Conroy & Hagger, 2018; Hagger, Lonsdale, & Chatzisarantis, 2011; Hagger et al, 2012; Hamilton, Keech, Peden, & Hagger, 2019; Pham & Taylor, 1999), Keech et al (2019) developed a novel imagery‐based technique to induce a stress‐is‐enhancing mindset. Participants were initially prompted to identify typical stressors in their daily life, and then engage in a series of visualization exercises in which they imagined the potentially positive consequences of stressor and the actions they could take to experience these positive consequences.…”
Section: How Appraisal Strategies Could Assist In Managing Stress Durmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, participants were required to actively acknowledge they endorsed the position advocated in the materials. Similarly, building on imagery intervention research (Conroy & Hagger, 2018; Hagger, Lonsdale, & Chatzisarantis, 2011; Hagger et al, 2012; Hamilton, Keech, Peden, & Hagger, 2019; Pham & Taylor, 1999), Keech et al (2019) developed a novel imagery‐based technique to induce a stress‐is‐enhancing mindset. Participants were initially prompted to identify typical stressors in their daily life, and then engage in a series of visualization exercises in which they imagined the potentially positive consequences of stressor and the actions they could take to experience these positive consequences.…”
Section: How Appraisal Strategies Could Assist In Managing Stress Durmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compensate for the missing home visits, participants visualise themselves performing specific LiFE activities in their home environment (BCT 15.2. mental rehearsal of successful performance). Visualisation as a mental technique [48] has been applied in LiFE [33] and was successfully used in previous physical activity interventions [49,50] and has been positively evaluated in a meta-analysis [51].…”
Section: Pillar Iii: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details of the study design and procedure, see the study pre-registration: https://osf.io/en7q8/ Intervention development and optimization. The intervention materials were developed based on examples and mechanisms identified in our prior research (Keech et al, 2018); the three domains of stress mindset (performance and productivity, health and vitality, and learning and growth; Crum et al, 2013); and best-practice techniques for mental imagery interventions (Conroy & Hagger, 2018;Hamilton, Keech, Peden, & Hagger, 2019). Prior to recording, the imagery scripts were reviewed by a panel of experts, and by two members of the target population.…”
Section: Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study has several strengths that enhance understanding of the effects of stress mindsets on health and performance outcomes. First, the study tested a novel imagerybased intervention which was rigorously pilot tested and informed by prior research into stress mindset (Keech et al, 2018), and best practice guidelines for imagery interventions (Conroy & Hagger, 2018;Hamilton et al, 2019). Second, the study sought to minimize bias using a pre-registered double-blinded randomized controlled trial design.…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%