1992
DOI: 10.1029/92je00789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Images and topographic relief at the North Pole of Venus

Abstract: We report on the analysis of unique coverage of the north pole of Venus using a subset of 13 images from a total of about 775 synthetic aperture radar orbits during cycle 1 of the Magellan mission. We present images at 13 distinctly different azimuths that range over 360° in longitude and that show the topographic relief at vastly different imaging geometries at intervals of about 20°. A pair of intersecting or crossing orbits is used to assess the topographic relief with stereo radargrammetric techniques, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] Stereo-derived topography was generated using the radargrammetric method described by Leberl et al [1992]. This study utilizes the Magellan Stereo Toolkit (MST) to derive topography from the stereo data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Stereo-derived topography was generated using the radargrammetric method described by Leberl et al [1992]. This study utilizes the Magellan Stereo Toolkit (MST) to derive topography from the stereo data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the two approaches is that the parallax measurements are made using the phase difference in InSAR and amplitude in radargrammetry. Radargrammetry has been used for producing the surface relief of the planet Venus by the S-band Magellan-SAR [320][321][322] and Earth by RADARSAT [323] with recent examples by TerraSAR-X [324], Cosmo-SkyMed [325], and the combination of the both [326]. These techniques require multiple sets of complex (InSAR) or amplitude (radargrammetry) SAR data.…”
Section: Other Land Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%