2011
DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2011.547306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaginary subjects: school science, indigenous students, and knowledge–power relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued by Kidman, Abrams, and McRae [2011;see also Richardson, 2011], these selective appropriations of disci-plinary knowledge routinely leave as settled the very knowledge-power relations defined by whiteness that have historically structured and continue to structure inequalities in society, science, and science education. To design within a desettling frame means, then, to understand and take up these knowledge-power relationsand assumed assimilation into particular knowledge paradigms -as an explicit object of inquiry in the science classroom.…”
Section: Implications For Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued by Kidman, Abrams, and McRae [2011;see also Richardson, 2011], these selective appropriations of disci-plinary knowledge routinely leave as settled the very knowledge-power relations defined by whiteness that have historically structured and continue to structure inequalities in society, science, and science education. To design within a desettling frame means, then, to understand and take up these knowledge-power relationsand assumed assimilation into particular knowledge paradigms -as an explicit object of inquiry in the science classroom.…”
Section: Implications For Teaching and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whānau strongly believed that being possessed of the knowledge of the land, the people, and te reo was a strong foundation upon which to acquire other knowledge, other language, and other ideologies. Advocates of PBL, such as Kawagley and Barnhardt (1999), Penetito (2009), and Kidman et al (2011), believe such a framework can help alleviate the tension that currently exists between Western education pedagogies and holistic indigenous education models. These authors also assert that PBL can move the curriculum towards a new and exciting place where ownership by students over characteristics and features of classroom-based learning can be given heightened relevance.…”
Section: Mana ūKaipo: a Sense Of Place And Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, indigenous students potentially internalize negative images of their culture created and propagated by the institution of schooling as unable, historically and currently, to be producers of mathematical and scientific knowledge and indigenous students as low-achieving mathematics and science learners (Kidman, Abrams & McRae, 2010). Other factors implicit in role of schooling may be causing indigenous learners to "opt out" of the learning of science and mathematics (Abrams, Yen, Blatt & Ho, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%