Imaginative play for a predictive spectator: theatre, affordance spaces, and predictive engagement

Murphy, Maiya

doi:10.1007/s11097-021-09783-6

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The next step is to re-articulate this new perspective in practice. This means exploring the connection between ecological psychology and enactivism, and STS, where ecological psychology and enactivism could focus on the experiential and normative aspects of coordination among different practices, as already happens in the context of other kinds of practices, such as architecture (Rietveld and Kiverstein, 2014;Rietveld and Brouwers, 2017;van Dijk andRietveld, 2017, 2021), pretend play (Szokolszky and Read, 2021;Murphy, 2022), education (Young, 2004;Gresalfi et al, 2012;Phillips and Finn, 2022), and many others. On the contrary, STS could provide the methods for studying the practices themselves, e.g., through ethnography and qualitative research (Latour and Woolgar, 1979;Latour, 1987;Mol, 2002;Greiffenhagen et al, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Situating the KTA gap in clinical research: Foregrounding a discontinuity in practices

Rienzo

2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, I will claim that we need to rearticulate the so-called “knowledge-to-action” (KTA) gap metaphor in clinical research as a discontinuity of practices. In clinical research, there is a significant delay between the production of research results and their application in policy and practice. These difficulties are normally conceptualized through the metaphor of the KTA gap between scientific knowledge and practical applications. I will advise that it is important to reformulate the terms of the problem, as they suggest the difficulty lies only in the results generated on one side (the laboratory), not reaching the other side (the clinic), and that crossing the gap requires us to simply optimize the transfer and exchange of knowledge. This perspective considers knowledge separate from the practices from which it was generated, making it into a thing that can be transported and transferred largely independently from the communities that produce or “possess” it. The paper then revises the terms of the problem, shifting the focus from knowledge understood as independent from practical circumstances to the situated practices of knowing. Knowledge will then be understood as enacted in practice, emerging as people interact recurrently in the context of established practices. When people coming from different domains and with different “ends-in-view” must coordinate, they have to deal with conceptual and practical tensions, different ways of doing things with their surroundings, and different normative practices. Considering that, the KTA gap will be revised, not as a gap between scientific results and their application in clinical practice, but as a discontinuity in how communities engage with their local contexts and what they perceive as relevant for their activities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Situating the KTA gap in clinical research: Foregrounding a discontinuity in practices

Rienzo

2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Imaginative play for a predictive spectator: theatre, affordance spaces, and predictive engagement

Cited by 1 publication

References 38 publications

Situating the KTA gap in clinical research: Foregrounding a discontinuity in practices

Situating the KTA gap in clinical research: Foregrounding a discontinuity in practices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About